parts ban proposal

[Nukes]

Waxman, one of the usual suspects, is at it again:

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/new-bi...6vAITiv.99

[montana]

The anti-freedom group never rest. A free and independent population must scare the heck out of these people. The story never changes, just the name of the characters.

[LRRPF52]

Duplicate post-already covered before within the past week here. Use the custom search engine for this site, as it will find what you're looking for quickly:

https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=01636...cu1o&hl=en

[Nukes]

The ambiguity of the language in these bills is what has given such a free hand to the BATFE to destroy the 2nd Amendment with far-reaching administrative "law" and interpretations.

[LR1955]

Guys:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr2910

Prognosis is that this bill has a 0 (Zero) percent chance of getting past committee and a 0 (Zero) percent chance of being enacted.

Leftists have always wanted to ban guns. They always will. This bill isn't a threat right now.

LR1955

[Nukes]

Having seen the changes from GCA '68 to present, I take a trans-generational long view. Two-steps-forward-one-step-backwards has advanced their agenda. It starts with a concept, continues with verbiage and emotional imagery, and awaits the opportune "crisis" (manufactured or otherwise).

We cannot afford to be complacent or discount any of their moves against the RKBA. Who thinks that the generation that gets suspended for eating a cookie into a gun shape will support the RKBA as strongly as the generation that preceded GCA '68? We need to shape the RKBA perspective of younger generations.

We need to shape the language and the terms of the debate. To do otherwise is to be defeated. If we wait until their plans are an immediate threat is to be defeated, so I counsel against complacency.

[Trooper]

Guys:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr2910

Prognosis is that this bill has a 0 (Zero) percent chance of getting past committee and a 0 (Zero) percent chance of being enacted.

Leftists have always wanted to ban guns. They always will. This bill isn't a threat right now.

LR1955

For now. If the republicans lose in 2014, then January 2015 this bill will be one of the first proposed. I have heard a number of left-wingers talking about this. They want every part to have a serial number. And for you to pay taxes on every part.

[LR1955]

For now. If the republicans lose in 2014, then January 2015 this bill will be one of the first proposed. I have heard a number of left-wingers talking about this. They want every part to have a serial number. And for you to pay taxes on every part.

Trooper:

I said it isn't a threat now so I won't waste my time now. It is better to support candidates who opposed those who call themselves 'Progressives' now than to worry about this bill now.

LR1955

[Trooper]

Trooper:

I said it isn't a threat now so I won't waste my time now. It is better to support candidates who opposed those who call themselves 'Progressives' now than to worry about this bill now.

LR1955

I think that we were saying the same thing. The real threat is not this bill but rather that the democrats could get total control of the US government. At that point, January 2015, all gun ownership would be threatened.