Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Today Feinstein, Lautenberg, Bloomberg ...
#1
...Schumer, Blumenthal, Reid, Levin, Nadler, Franken, Schatz, Wyden, Boxer, Cardin, Schatz, Lowenthal, Frankel, Schiff, et al. put you in your place, slaves:

Connecticut’s two U.S. senators are joining forces with California Sen.
Dianne Feinstein and other key senators, proposing a retooled federal
ban on assault weapons ... Sen. Richard Blumenthal told The Associated
Press on Wednesday that the proposed legislation, to be unveiled
Thursday in Washington, D.C., will more narrowly define what’s
considered an assault weapon under a resurrected ban. The bill, he said,
will also prohibit high-capacity magazines, limiting them to a capacity
of up to nine rounds of ammunition.

Feinstein, Conn. Senators Set To Propose Assault Weapons Ban
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/01...apons-ban/



Let's have more gun control legislation, the Democrats essentially say,
even though we know it won't stop madmen from slaughtering innocent
children because it makes us look like we care. So what if most of the
murders occur in cities with the toughest gun laws? Let's trot out the
fake letters supposedly written by children terrified of being shot in
school. Let's toss away the letters from kids begging for Obama to get
jobs for their fathers. Seriously, who believes their tripe anymore?
Apparently a lot, because they show up at rallies and cheer Obama's
speeches. I'm beginning to think a good portion of the nation has been
lobotomized and has lost the ability to reason with any acuity.

Gun Control Frenzy- Proof Democrats Are The Real Racists
By Alicia Colon
Irish Examiner USA
http://www.irishexaminerusa.com/mt/2013/...democ.html


===========
National ‘assault weapon’ ban coming today
By Emily Miller*
Senior editor of the opinion pages
The Washington Times
January 24, 2013
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/guns...-thursday/


Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office confirmed that she will be introducing in
the Senate Thursday a new version of the so-called assault weapon ban. A
spokesman said the full text will be released at a press conference on
Thursday.

The California Democrat intends to expand on the ban that expired in
2004, by including handguns and shotguns, in addition to rifles. She
would decrease from two to one the number of cosmetic features on a gun
to have it be considered an “assault weapon.” This means that if a gun
has just one item like a pistol grip or bayonet lug, then it is illegal.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed into law the same ban in New York last week.

Furthermore, instead of grandfathering in current firearms, she would
create a national gun registry for the government to track lawful gun
owners. Magazines would again be limited to 10 rounds.

The Clinton-era bill was not renewed by Congress after the Federal
Bureau of Investigation and law enforcement agencies reported that it
was ineffective in reducing crime.

President Obama said that a top priority is to get “an assault weapons
ban that is meaningful” passed this year.

A summary of Mrs. Feinstein’s legislation is below.

Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of: 120
specifically-named firearms; certain other semiautomatic rifles,
handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or
more military characteristics; and semiautomatic rifles and handguns
with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test;
eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from
the characteristics test; and banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks”
and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans.

Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more
than 10 rounds.

Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment;
exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or
sporting purposes; and exempting antique, manually-operated, and
permanently disabled weapons.

Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National
Firearms Act, to include: Background check of owner and any transferee;
type and serial number of the firearm; positive identification,
including photograph and fingerprint; certification from local law
enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or
local law; and dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration.


*Emily Miller is senior editor of the opinion pages for The Washington
Times. Her "Emily Gets Her Gun" series on the District's gun laws won
the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the
Institute on Political Journalism. Click here to follow her on Twitter
and Facebook.

Read more:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/guns...z2Iu1O2FwA
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Reply
#2
Idiots
Reply
#3
Dangerous tyrannical idiots!
Reply
#4
The real battle is happening right now, before this ever gets to the floor. That battle is Dirty Harry Reid's attempt to change the Senate rules to effectively get rid of the fillibuster

Contact your Senators and tell them to vote no

NOW!!
Reply
#5
Im tired of trying toto reason with unreasonable people.
Reply
#6
Have you joined the NRA and Second Amendment Foundation, how about GOA?

C'mon guys, the fight is on, and if you haven't, you have no voice!
”You seek escape from pain. We seek the achievement of happiness. You exist for the sake of avoiding punishment. We exist for the sake of earning rewards. Threats will not make us function; fear is not our incentive. It is not death that we wish to avoid, but life that we wish to live.” - John Galt
Reply
#7
bwaites Wrote:Have you joined the NRA and Second Amendment Foundation, how about GOA?

C'mon guys, the fight is on, and if you haven't, you have no voice!


I second this comment, its now or never.
Reply
#8
Im NRA member
Reply
#9
Too many "berg's" in there
Reply
#10
Im not finished fighting, i havent even got started. Piss on all of them! Bring it!
Reply
#11
bwaites Wrote:Have you joined the NRA and Second Amendment Foundation, how about GOA?

C'mon guys, the fight is on, and if you haven't, you have no voice!

I am an NRA memeber and I am an IFC memeber
Iowa Firearms Coalition

The IFC was instrumental in getting the CCW laws taken from the whims of the Sherifs here in Iowa
Reply
#12
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-r...n-thursday
Reply
#13
tonedaddy Wrote:Too many "berg's" in there

Whatever flimsy excuse they give, this is just tribal politicians trying to reduce blowback against the tribal banksters when they completely collapse the economy. When the full impact of their economic crimes against humanity becomes clear to every hungry American, they'd prefer we be completely powerless.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-r...n-thursday
Reply
#14
They're up for re-election in 2014, and only a few can afford to support this type of legislation. Of course, after the last blatant massive election fraud without much of a peep from the peasants, they might be feeling pretty safe with accepting foreign bribes in the form of bundling with no accountability for the sources of the money, so with the help of the propaganda apparatchik, they can plow through into "re-election" while the boy scouts' and girl scouts' voices are ignored.
Reply
#15
LRRPF52 Wrote:They're up for re-election in 2014, and only a few can afford to support this type of legislation. Of course, after the last blatant massive election fraud without much of a peep from the peasants, they might be feeling pretty safe with accepting foreign bribes in the form of bundling with no accountability for the sources of the money, so with the help of the propaganda apparatchik, they can plow through into "re-election" while the boy scouts' and girl scouts' voices are ignored.

Maybe foreign funding could account for Manchin's behavior---

//////"When it became clear that we were not going to find common ground, and that Senator Manchin intends to support magazine capacity limits and other pointless gun-control laws doomed to failure, I told the senator that we would be there. We would be at every single event. We would be at every fund-raiser. We would be there, and the content of our signs would not be pleasant.

And now we get to the second conversation. The one between the lines. When I said we would be there, he said, “there won’t be any events.”

This confused me. No politician runs for office without fund-raisers and events. And I have to admit, it wasn’t I that grasped the meaning of this. I want to be clear, that the following was not stated. This was deduced by a confidant of mine, and I think she is correct. Manchin was honest. There will be no events. Why would a US Senator not need funds? This is because there will be no campaign. Joe Manchin is too young to retire from a position of such power. What does that mean?

West Virginia, this means that Joe Manchin has sold you out. It means that he has accepted some position, likely promised by Barack Obama, to place his boot in your neck in exchange for power."\\\\\\\\

http://dcclothesline.wordpress.com/2013/...-sold-out/

Either that or some other deal he's cut with Barry and his ilk....
Life member NRA, SAF, GOA, WVSRPA (and VFW). Also member WVCDL. Join NOW!!!!!
We either hang together on this, or we'll certainly HANG separately.....
Reply
#16
Nuke has got it right.
Reply
#17
The wife and I are NRA members. Also, if you are a retired or active military, law enforcement, or took the oath to uphold the Constitution, I suggest you check out and join the Oathkeepers (oathkeepers.org).
Reply
#18
You'll LOVE this:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/pol...s-gun-grab
Reply
#19
Lifer NRA, Lifer GOA, Lifer 2AF. I aint takin this sitting down.
Reply
#20
Obama giving the brotherhood f-16 fighters and don't want me to have an AR. Sounds like democrats.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)