![]() |
|
6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Printable Version +- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com) +-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel Military & Law Enforcement (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Thread: 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA (/showthread.php?tid=5013) Pages:
1
2
|
6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - cory - 02-27-2013 Alright so I'm not real sure where to place this. It somewhat goes along with the conversations that we've had here recently. Bwaites if there's somewhere else this belongs relocate me please. Anyways Does anybody have a link to or a CAD file for 6.5 Grendel Brass, they could provide me with? I'm currently taking a class on Finite Element Analysis. It's basically computer aided stress analysis and thermal analysis. I thought it'd be fun to do the FEA on Grendel brass at max pressure under optimal operations, through a range of expected pressures. I've debated on comparing it to the 5.56 Nato brass and maybe another brass, but I don't think it'll serve any useful purpose. If you think I'm wrong and it will please let me know and I may go that route. So back to the CAD file. I could CAD it up myself, but honestly I don't have the time. There's also the fact that since it's SAMMI Spec'd the CAD should already be out there somewhere and likely more accurate than what I'd CAD myself. My intent is to get the most accurate results, as possible. I do plan to open source the results it on the forum. I know they're at least a few nerds like me on here that'd find it interesting. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - LRRPF52 - 02-27-2013 If I were you, I would consider just cutting a piece of Grendel brass in half longitudinally, taking a picture of it, and making your CAD file that way. What would be very helpful to the forum would be if you compared Lapua, Hornady, Wolf PPU, 7.62x39 Federal, Lapua, Winchester, IMI, etc. necked-down to Grendel. The members here could provide you with samples of everything you don't have brass-wise. You would also want to do a hardness analysis on all the samples, as they aren't the same. Lapua brass has the best longevity. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - dmsims21 - 02-27-2013 I could model the brass in SolidWorks. I would need someone to supply external and internal dimensions. Meaning full results will be tricky as the material properties are different at the head and neck do to annealing. It would be interesting to check if case stress would be different in max and min chambers due to varying deformation. Simulating the "belted magnum" affect due to early extraction would be cool too. Sorry to ramble and pull big words out of the air. It has been a long time since I took an FEA class. Good luck. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - cory - 02-27-2013 LRRPF52 Wrote:If I were you, I would consider just cutting a piece of Grendel brass in half longitudinally, taking a picture of it, and making your CAD file that way. I found some dimensions for the Grendel, but I'm not sure how accurate they are. http://www.6mmbr.com/cartridgediagrams.html If it is correct all I'd need to do is cut some brass in two and measure the material thickness. I've got Hornady and Lapua Brass I could measure, if someone could provide me with the measurements or the other brass itself. Any suggestions on how to best cut brass in half without damaging it more than necessary? I don't have the resources for a hardness analysis at this time. If someone here does and could provide the data, it would be much appreciated. dmsims21 Wrote:I could model the brass in SolidWorks. I would need someone to supply external and internal dimensions. Meaning full results will be tricky as the material properties are different at the head and neck do to annealing. It would be interesting to check if case stress would be different in max and min chambers due to varying deformation. Simulating the "belted magnum" affect due to early extraction would be cool too. dmsims21 welcome aboard! If you had time to model it that'd be great, if not I'm sure I'll find time to do it. Could you elaborate on the "belted magnum" effect? I intend to do my initial analysis at the instance before the bolt releases, with the assumption that pressure is the highest at that point in time. I may continue it introducing more variables as I go, if it appears further analysis is useful/necessary. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - JASmith - 02-27-2013 Excellent project!! You will learn a lot. I have a QuickDesign rendering of the Grendel based on a SAAMI - compliant drawing. I used it to design the .20 Grendel cartridge. The volume and resulting Quickload velocities turned out rather close to the measured numbers. PM me with an email address if you can use it. If you are truly serious about modeling the Grendel, then you should contact VarmintAl. He has a rather interesting background, but suffice it to say he knows FEA rather well. He used LSDYNA for calculations like the one you are contemplating. He would be very pleased to offer advice and reference links. I can go into the differences between codes, but you will want to check to see if the one your class uses is capable of modeling at least static and preferably dynamic plasticity (implicit versus explicit time steps). Absent that feature, you will be able to get an idea of when the brass starts to get overstressed, but most codes start to crash when the elastic limits are exceeded. I have some appreciation of the challenges of getting started in finite element analysis. Don't give up if the code you are obliged to use is limited to elastic behavior. It won't model the case behavior as the pressures get high enough to abuse the case. Other interesting analyses can be done where the system response is fully elastic. One is the response of the bolt head. Another is the chamber region. Fatigue in these areas are partly why Bill Alexander established the 50,000 PSI operating pressure rather than the 10-20% higher pressures the case can handle. I used his results in working of a possible method of determining when pressures get too high. The method is probably useful only when the brass starts to move enough that inreases in pressures give one loose primers or worse. Those pressures are significantly higher than the nominal 50,000 psi one gets with SAAMI-compliant loads for the Grendel. Look at his analysis of the .243 Winchester cartridge in the chamber and then contact him. If your email doesn't get answered in a few days, then it probably got snagged by his spam checker. PM me and I'll make sure the connection gets made. PS I ran codes like these from the mid-80s through the late '90s so. I also know that VarmintAL was one of the most highly respected engineering analysts where I worked. He will be able to help even if he hasn't, like me, recently run a calculation. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Trooper - 02-27-2013 Out of curiousity, could one make the cases out of plastic? Steel would work, of course. The military is starting to realize that it is very wasteful to leave brass in a combat zone. Plastic makes more sense (weight) but steel would do for military purposes. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - cory - 02-27-2013 JASmith Wrote:Excellent project!! You will learn a lot. PM sent. Than You! VarmintAl I'm assuming he's a member of the horde, I'll be in contact with him in the near future. I'll be using an academic version of Patran. Unfortunately I know it limits the use of several advance functions. I'll be surprised if it's not limited to elastic behavior, but I'll check on that and let you know. At this point in my experience, all of my challenges in FEA's has been with a finicky software. I'd be shocked if Patran was the FEA software of choice for anyone. I actually have been expecting the brass to remain structurally sound beyond the 50 ksi limit, demonstrating the bolt to be the likely weak link. I'm hoping this would at the very least contribute to the discussion on improving the Grendel, started by Guardsman26. I would like to continue this project to eventually include the bolt in a dynamic analysis, to demonstrate where the bolt could be improved. However, that may remain outside the scope of my abilities. It certainly does at the moment. haha 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - cory - 02-27-2013 Trooper Wrote:Out of curiousity, could one make the cases out of plastic? Steel would work, of course. I love the idea of examining the brass with different materials. If you could provide me with the material characteristics of the materials you had in mind I could include it. I do seriously doubt a nonmetallic material could withstand the heat, without failing and/or melting to the barrel. However, it would be interesting to see the outcome of a stress/thermal FEA on a non metallic material. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - dmsims21 - 02-28-2013 The belted magnum I was referring to is when the case head expands due to the case being partially extracted before the pressure drops. You can see pictures here. http://www.65grendel.com/forum/showthread.php?3471-Help!-Reloading-Problems-Way-Overpressure 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Variable - 02-28-2013 cory Wrote:I do seriously doubt a nonmetallic material could withstand the heat, without failing and/or melting to the barrel. However, it would be interesting to see the outcome of a stress/thermal FEA on a non metallic material. It affects heat too. Brass cases pull heat out of the chamber on their way out. Plastic--- not so much... 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Nukes - 02-28-2013 Not to divert too far afield, but what have we learned about caseless ammo in all these regards? Pressure, heat, etc.? 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - JASmith - 02-28-2013 The most recent hit when I just did a Google search for "plastic cartridges" is this one: http://www.polymersolutions.com/blog/making-ammunition-with-plastic-cartridge-casings/. There was some discussion in other forums about that time as well. Ironically, they would probably work just fine for the hunter and target shooter where the barrels get a chance to cool between shots. Reloadability is another issue. The military challenge is keeping them from melting or otherwise misbehaving when the barrel and chamber start to glow from extended rapid or full-auto fire. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Bill Alexander - 02-28-2013 The operating pressure and shape for the Grendel was partially derived with one eye on the use of a polymer casing. It has several attributes where it is similar to a steel case in behavior. While such a move would preclude the move towards a hotter loading as discussed in the military section of this forum it is quite possible with the current set up. The challenges facing the use of polymers in a case are now primarily bullet retention and a clean release. Obturation is fine but some work is required as pressures rise above 24,000 psi.The interaction of the case with a hot chamber has been addressed successfully if one cares to dig enough but this seems to evade the current efforts except one. Reloading is not possible. In the examination of an FEA model I think you will find that the construction of the support structure and the constraints thereof are the biggest challenges. The system should all exist in the elastic regime except the case which does exhibit plastic behavior so your model should be able to account for both. For those interested the simple version is to examine the relative hoop expansion of the dissimilar materials as a compound thick cylinder problem. Very crude but enlightening. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Nukes - 02-28-2013 JASmith Wrote:...The military challenge is keeping them from melting or otherwise misbehaving when the barrel and chamber start to glow from extended rapid or full-auto fire. Is this the same issue that caused caseless ammo to fade into oblivion? 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Trooper - 02-28-2013 Tony Williams (http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/Assault.htm) has written about using caseless ammo. The big problem is that it breaks apart if it gets wet. Thus it has to be in a magazine. Plastic cases might work. If nothing else, steel cases. But it is expensive to leave brass on the battlefield. Plus the military does not reload, they just recycle the brass. Might as well go to steel. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Trooper - 02-28-2013 Bill Alexander Wrote:The operating pressure and shape for the Grendel was partially derived with one eye on the use of a polymer casing. It has several attributes where it is similar to a steel case in behavior. While such a move would preclude the move towards a hotter loading as discussed in the military section of this forum it is quite possible with the current set up. The military does not reload, they merely recycle the brass. Thus for military or law enforcement it makes more sense to use steel or plastic cases. Save the brass for the civilian market where there are those who reload. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - JASmith - 02-28-2013 What would the market consequences be if Law-Enforcement went completely to plastic cases and the military to steel cases? The recent multi-billion round order would have been filled without impacting the brass market. But, would manufacturers find enough remaining business in the civilian market to justify continuing brass cases? How would that impact reloaders? 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Nukes - 02-28-2013 Thank you for the lead on caseless ammo. If someone can explain the interior ballistics issues of steel v. brass v. aluminum cases, I would be most edified. I assume that relatively ductile steel and aluminum alloys are selected, but am curious about the materials issues. I never hesitated to use Blazer in my Glock, but somehow, perhaps only because of a vague concern for accelerated chamber wear and a nearly superstitious aversion, have not yet been willing to use any steel case ammo in any of my rifles. JASmith Wrote:What would the market consequences be if Law-Enforcement went completely to plastic cases and the military to steel cases? The recent multi-billion round order would have been filled without impacting the brass market. The control grid would likely find that a compelling reason to cease use of brass-cased ammo. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - Trooper - 02-28-2013 JASmith Wrote:What would the market consequences be if Law-Enforcement went completely to plastic cases and the military to steel cases? The recent multi-billion round order would have been filled without impacting the brass market. Of course there is a civilian market. It is far larger than the military/LE market. In fact most gun makers and ammo companies could not survive on the government market. Thus brass would be in order for civilians. If nothing else there would be a large reloading community to purchase brass. Duty ammo would be either plastic or steel. Cheaper given that government does not reload thus throws the brass away (at least recycles it). And it is a waste to leave brass on the battlefield. China is basically buying up all of the copper mines worldwide. Afghanistan has the second largest copper deposits in the world. China is ready to take that over once we are out of there. 6.5 Grendel CAD - FEA - LRRPF52 - 02-28-2013 Trooper Wrote:China is basically buying up all of the copper mines worldwide. Afghanistan has the second largest copper deposits in the world. China is ready to take that over once we are out of there. China has already begun extraction of minerals, oil, natural gas, and lithium in Afghanistan, while the saps from NATO/ISAF ensure the main Afghan ring road is kept open. They were pulling the strings all along, to include the use of dozens of surrogate jihadi groups like Al Qaeda based out of Pakistan to trigger Western knee-jerk responses into the region. China can't get enough minerals, energy, cement, or food, as they have a population with the following trend: ![]() They are at 1.347 billion people now, with only external solutions for relieving the pressure caused by excess population, which means they need mostly America's real estate more than anything, as it's the only arable farmland and resource-rich land with the infrastructure to take goods to the seas readily. Sucking us into dead-end foreign wars has been extremely beneficial for China & Russia over the past 12 years, especially as you look at the sacrifice of force posture in the Pacific Rim and Europe, where the US has drawn on for units to deploy to Central Asia and the Middle East (two areas that you really don't want to deploy conventional forces). It actually benefits China the longer foreign forces stay in Afghanistan, pulling security for them, as they are then able to focus on mineral and resource extraction, while keeping the shenanigans up with surrogate drug & arms-smuggling warlords based out of Pakistan and Iran, who have their own competition for Afghanistan based largely on Shia-Sunni rivalry, compounded by no less than a dozen varying terrorist groups with state-sponsorship. It takes about 5 years of study just to become familiar with the various factions out of Pakistan alone, as you will have no clue of what is remotely going on there without a good understanding of who the actors are, what their interests are, and how global powers use these factions to press their interests. Pakistan jumps to the tune of China, as China is the most significant supplier of arms to them when you accept that China gave them their nukes, to use Pakistan as a surrogate flanking piece against China's main arch-rival: India. Since Pakistan is an illegitimate separate state broken off from India politically, given full legitimacy in the UN by China's demand, it all starts to make sense. The last generation of UK foreign policy/intel/military types had a much better understanding of this backdrop, having been thoroughly invested in the sub-continent before Indian independence, the Paki fragmentation, and so forth. You would think that the UK wouldn't want to touch Afghanistan again after the 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Anglo-Afghan Wars of 1839–1842, 1878–1880, and 1919. You would also think that the US would never make the mistake of committing conventional forces to the land-locked dead-end of military conquest, since "we" used it to suck the Soviets into, leading to the collapse of the Soviet Union after their 10-year waste of resources from 1979-1989. The short story is that all metals, including brass and copper, will only be more and more in demand as Chinese and Indians transition from trash shacks and mud-floor huts to quasi-European-type pigeon-hole cracker box apartment units constructed of cement, with rebar, plumbing, electrical, etc. |