6.5 Grendel Forum
PEW Science dot com - Printable Version

+- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com)
+-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel NFA Center (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Thread: PEW Science dot com (/showthread.php?tid=25375)



PEW Science dot com - Happy2Shoot - 02-03-2023

Please explain to me in very simple terms why I am too dumb to understand his rating system.

I am a member so I can see the dB's. I look at various silencers with very similar dB ratings but his proprietary rating system shows a great difference. Sometimes, a louder can gets a more favorable rating.

The website testing is pay to play I believe. That right there makes me wonder.

I may be wrong, I may be dumb. Let me know.


PEW Science dot com - Zeneffect - 02-03-2023

"Silencer Sound Standard™
SSS.4 - Test Method and Results
The following are paramount for adherence to this standard:

Accurate pressure waveforms.

PEW-SOFT is an excellent tool for generating those. The Silencer Sound Standard combines PEW-SOFT data with empirically validated hearing damage models."

I stopped there. PEW-SOFT? Sounds like something a *insert religious joke*

Dissecting just this little excerpt:

Section SSS.4 - Test Method and Results

Subsection - Accurate pressure waveforms

"an excellent tool for generating those" - "Those" shouldn't be inferred as Accurate pressure waveforms in the first sentence of a technical document.


I doubt said software exists.