![]() |
|
PEW Science dot com - Printable Version +- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com) +-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel NFA Center (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Thread: PEW Science dot com (/showthread.php?tid=25375) |
PEW Science dot com - Happy2Shoot - 02-03-2023 Please explain to me in very simple terms why I am too dumb to understand his rating system. I am a member so I can see the dB's. I look at various silencers with very similar dB ratings but his proprietary rating system shows a great difference. Sometimes, a louder can gets a more favorable rating. The website testing is pay to play I believe. That right there makes me wonder. I may be wrong, I may be dumb. Let me know. PEW Science dot com - Zeneffect - 02-03-2023 "Silencer Sound Standard™ SSS.4 - Test Method and Results The following are paramount for adherence to this standard: Accurate pressure waveforms. PEW-SOFT is an excellent tool for generating those. The Silencer Sound Standard combines PEW-SOFT data with empirically validated hearing damage models." I stopped there. PEW-SOFT? Sounds like something a *insert religious joke* Dissecting just this little excerpt: Section SSS.4 - Test Method and Results Subsection - Accurate pressure waveforms "an excellent tool for generating those" - "Those" shouldn't be inferred as Accurate pressure waveforms in the first sentence of a technical document. I doubt said software exists. |