LRRPF52 Wrote:It has a sun shade on it.

Tedward Wrote:If I go on a hunt in Colorado and want to ship my rifle while I take the plane, it needs to be shipped to an FFL.

Quote:Q: May a nonlicensee ship firearms interstate for his or her use in hunting or other lawful activity?
Yes. A person may ship a firearm to himself or herself in care of another person in the State where he or she intends to hunt or engage in any other lawful activity. The package should be addressed to the owner. Persons other than the owner should not open the package and take possession of the firearm.

BjornF16 Wrote:



http://www.atf.gov/content/firearms-frequently-asked-questions-unlicensed-persons#shipping-firearms-carrier

LRRPF52 Wrote:My knickers are still in a knot, and I can't resort to alcohol as an escape. What to do.....

BjornF16 Wrote:I could mail you some alcohol from Texas...LOL

LRRPF52 Wrote:Diane Feinstein submitted legislation that follows the description of Tedward and Ridgerider, i.e. Quality Arms of Idaho.

It was defeated by a significant margin in the Senate earlier this year, by the upper house of the Legislative Branch of the United States, and wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of even getting out of committee in the lower house.

That bill aimed to regulate basically every part of a firearm, aside from the serialized receiver. No LEO or court has grounds to stand on by attempting to regulate any parts other than the serialized receiver.

Happy holidays, and thanks for the compliments.

LRRPF52 Wrote:My knickers are still in a knot, and I can't resort to alcohol as an escape. What to do.....

NugginFutz Wrote:ROFL!!! That just made my day and took the sour taste of this thread out of my mouth!!!

cory Wrote:Wrong??? Not following the rules or a corrupt unconstitutional agency is wrong??? I live my life according to my principles and what I believe to be right and wrong, good and evil, not what men say and write on paper.

What's wrong here is us allowing ATF to dictate anything, allowing the unconstitutional NFA to still stand, and to continue to allow the liberties of the next generation to be sacrificed because fighting for that liberty is to inconvenient.

What's wrong is blindly following anything, especially a corrupt unconstitutional law.

Ted your justification for what's right and wrong is likely the same type of justification used by those Jews who turned on their own in early Nazi Germany, those who turn on their own families in present day North Korea, those who turned on their own during the revolutionary war, etc...

My friend it seems we have very different definitions as to right and wrong.

Bwaites is exactly right, until it's attached to a serialized piece of gear it's just a hunk of metal. Will the corrupt, liberal, and/or misguided courts rule that way, I doubt it.