![]() |
|
Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Printable Version +- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com) +-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL FORUM NEWS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Thread: Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? (/showthread.php?tid=4688) |
Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - wiersy111 - 01-26-2013 carbontetrachloride Wrote:Shouldn't be a problem. They don't have any trouble firing on civilians in other countries.WOW!!!I don't know who you are but generalizing statements such as you have done here p!$$ me off. What qualifies you to make such a statement? I served 21 plus years in the Army as Mech Infantry and Armor yes those are 2 of the combat arms specialties with two tours in Iraq (90-91 and 04-05). We place total emphasis on avoiding collateral damage and civilian casualties. I attained the rank of Master Sergeant (E-8) We swore an oath the protect the United States of America from enemies foreign and domestic! We were bound to follow orders, unless they were illegal or immoral. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Deer Hunter - 01-26-2013 LRRPF52 Wrote:Here's how it goes down: Yes I believe you're spot on my man, a terrifyingly real possibility. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Deer Hunter - 01-26-2013 BjornF16 Wrote:DH...one thing you need to understand about General Officers (GO's)...they are ALL politicians. No one gets to be a GO without being an astute politician. Even reaching O-6 (full bird colonel) takes a basic level of political savvy. Im not ex-military as im sure youve figured out by now but i'm a big supporter of our men @ women in the Armed Services. I can tell i wouldve been in the trenches with yall because i could not have put up with some of the political shit being reigned upon our military. The Politicians constantly threaten not to pay for you guys as you lay in some tent in the desert hoping some hadji doesnt come in your tent strapped with explosives. Im so pissed off at Colin Powell and McChrystal. What a bunch of panzie asses! Its alot to ask but people like yourself and my fellow forum members are going to be asked once again to step up for your Country and lead us in the right direction. It might be A political position or it might be as warriors. This time i will be in the trenches with you. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Deer Hunter - 01-26-2013 carbontetrachloride Wrote:Shouldn't be a problem. They don't have any trouble firing on civilians in other countries. Man I dont know about this statement. Civilians do die in war, they always do. I actually think the military is being as careful as they can, to careful in my opinion. Orders like dont shoot unless fired upon and so forth. As far as im concerned if you look like enemy and you got a rifle in your hand youre game. As for drone strikes (thank the President) or artillery, well the people doing that are miles away and they cant always see the civilians there. Does it happen? Yes. Do I blame them? No. But we're talking two different things here. Killing civilians in another Country is worlds apart from killing your Countrymen. At least it makes a difference to me and these guys. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - LRRPF52 - 01-26-2013 You don't have to give any orders to kill Americans if the people you would order are the first to be targeted by the cartels, who are way better trained and experienced than 99% of US LEO's. You have to remember that Clinton started sending SF to train the Mexican military in CQB and other advanced light infantry tactics back in the early 1990's. The Mexican Airborne El Gafe unit's commander realized what kind of power he had with hundreds of highly-trained gun-slingers of that caliber, and went rogue, forming Los Zetas, who immediately became the enforcers for the Gulf Cartel. Once he realized that the Gulf Cartel's leadership was easy to push over with his enforcers, they split from the Gulf Cartel and went rogue again, and took most of the Gulf Cartel's territory and marketplace for the drug trade into the US, mainly through Laredo, TX. Ever since the Chinese took back Hong Kong from the Brits, the Triad Gangs of Hong Kong recognized the powers that be with the Communist Party, and immediately swore allegiance to the Party. There are some strange connection with MS-13 and the Triad Gangs, as MS-13 is an El Salvadoran gang that specializes in smuggling only. I suspect they were one of the mechanisms used to expropriate hundreds of millions in narco-cash that normally pass through the revenue cycle. They then instigated a massive fratricide between the Sinaloa, Gulf, and Zetas Cartels, which kicked off the 60,000+ cartel murders that started in what year...2007. That isn't a coincidence. Then again, you could order your puppet in the White House to turn his forces on the American people, as the narco-terrorists begin a covert killing campaign of sheriff's, while blaming it on the true patriots, who will be labeled extremists. Either way, the end result is the same...brother against brother, neighbor against neighbor, nation against nation. The main factor that will really set the blaze into widespread conflagration is when the next economic attack triggers food shortages. Then the savage nature of man will come out, and those who haven't prepared, but are adept at doing violence, will wreak havoc among a fat populace of ignoramuses who have no clue how to defend themselves, followed by widespread disease. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - hm2 clark - 01-27-2013 The way I learned it in 7th grade civics class is that governments employs 3 kinds of military forces (1) Field forces- for heavy combat (think US Army) (2)Regime protecion forces to impose its will on its own people (think DEA, ATF FBI) and (3) Ceremonial forces (think air force band). Would any of these forces fire on American civilians?....Think about Waco and Ruby Ridge. Try not to think about the song "Marching Through Georgia" . And as for silly police officers saying they wont enforce any new gun control laws ; they say that while supporting and feeding inteligence to the people (FBI etc) who will do the deed. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Nukes - 01-27-2013 Speaking of narco-cash revenue cycles, what was the take-home lesson about Mena, Arkansas, and Iran-Contra? There are interesting mentions of an analogous Sinaloa connection. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - sneaky one - 01-27-2013 It is good to ask a question or 2, to find the knowledge that we may already have inside. We all need to read-study more. Re-learn the human influence on everything. Learn the Govern. & military view of life on the planet- we have only this one globe, that is actually habitable. We - (as a group of tribal Nations)all need to get along=soon! , or this will be the end game. Or, we as a race go away of our own accord-= by stupidity. - greed & world power domination -remember hitler?. Time to fight, as a worldwide team. This BS has to stop -tommorrow!!! Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - hm2 clark - 01-27-2013 I think human nature is such that we will all get along-about the time we all stop eating meat ,give up sex except for procreation and just hold hands and sing ku by yah, Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - montana - 01-27-2013 Well put sneaky one. To understand human nature one only has to look at history. The same failings and and mistakes always seem to reappear with every new generation. Lessons learned are soon forgotten. The founding fathers understood the importance of division of power, a lesson lost on this generation. There is always some group or evil little piece of sh@# that always lurks in the back ground vying for opportunity of power. When you have a world struggling for limited resources and growing populations, fear and envy become the tools for these want to be dictators to grow. It is the constant struggle of good and evil. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Nukes - 01-27-2013 With all respect, Montana, while there may be some minerals that become "strategic" to those pursuing global hegemony for their tribe, the "limited resources/growing population" mantra is a shibboleth of the the tribe that seeks 95% depopulation and enslavement of the survivors. Paul Ehrlich's "population bomb" fizzled. His risible predictions of global starvation were followed by a half-century of nearly worldwide elimination of starvation.... UNTIL agricultural and energy cartels manipulated the "biofuel" market to cut food crop production, GMO-induced superweeds, terminator genes, etc. The efforts to weaponize food, water, and energy are, plain and simply, evil crimes against humanity that must be punished. Every last perpetrator and accomplice must be run to ground as certainly as every real or imaginary Nazi was run to ground. Let the Death Cabal be first in line as part of their own "95%." Nuremberg 2. Let the trials begin. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - LRRPF52 - 01-27-2013 The communists have always used food as a weapon, after confiscation of the guns. Look at what Stalin did to the Ukraine, for example. When reports starting making it out of the state-controlled media's reign on information from the Ukraine, people started asking questions. Stalin exclaimed that these were capitalist lies, and to prove it, he took the grain he was withholding from the Ukrainians, and started exporting it to the world to show that they had surpluses. Millions starved to death. One of the biggest challenges of globalization has been population explosion in areas where it normally wouldn't be possible, but with aid from foreign countries and technology developed and distributed by the UN, people's lifestyles have changed dramatically. Africa, for example, went from tribal subsistence farming, to over 90% of the people living in cities, often constructed of refuse. Africa doesn't have a series of rivers and deep sea ports that can sustain its current population without surpluses from foreign countries, and no amount of policy or good will can shape geography. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Nukes - 01-27-2013 As best I can tell, under both communism and predatory capitalism power and money, food and water, end up weaponized in the hands of the same tribe, dynastic banksters and monopolist financiers. Recall that it was ultra-capitalist Jakob Schiff of the Wall Street Kuhn Loeb bank that provided most of the financing for the 1917 ultra-communist revolutions. That was not a move of altruistic humanitarianism, but of genocidal hegemony. Too, let us recall that many of the murderous communist administrators and boots on the ground came from New York only to adopt Russian-sounding noms de guerre. Does anyone recall the language used at the first post-revolutionary Duma because so many did not speak Russian? Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - montana - 01-27-2013 Nukes Wrote:With all respect, Montana, while there may be some minerals that become "strategic" to those pursuing global hegemony for their tribe, the "limited resources/growing population" mantra is a shibboleth of the the tribe that seeks 95% depopulation and enslavement of the survivors. I said these were "tools" for the take over of power. Japan and Germany became economic power houses even though they have very few natural resources. Russia is blessed with many resources yet their system keeps them down. I agree with what you wrote and apologize for any confusion. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - LRRPF52 - 01-28-2013 Nukes Wrote:As best I can tell, under both communism and predatory capitalism power and money, food and water, end up weaponized in the hands of the same tribe, dynastic banksters and monopolist financiers. Recall that it was ultra-capitalist Jakob Schiff of the Wall Street Kuhn Loeb bank that provided most of the financing for the 1917 ultra-communist revolutions. That was not a move of altruistic humanitarianism, but of genocidal hegemony. Too, let us recall that many of the murderous communist administrators and boots on the ground came from New York only to adopt Russian-sounding noms de guerre. Does anyone recall the language used at the first post-revolutionary Duma because so many did not speak Russian? Kuhn & Loeb were based in Germany, with a New York office of course. Paul Warburg, of Kuhn & Loeb, is the one who framed the US Federal Reserve System. The banking elite do impose Marxism on those they yearn to subjugate, just like the Leninists. I think Griffin's perspective of the main powers divided into two camps reflects the historical events of the last century quite well, with what he calls "the Rhodesians" and "the Leninists". The Anglo-centric British Isles and old money European banking alliances fall under the Rhodesian school of thought, while the Communist nations adopted Leninism. Since no later than the late 1800's, the British have driven US foreign policy, and as their empire faded away on the surface, they were able to exert heavy influence over US foreign policy, shifting America from a nation of guarded isolationism, to an overt proxy for policing of the British Empire's trade routes, particularly obvious post-WWII. During the past 150 years, they have been successful in steering US elections, and staffing the White House with their US version of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, called the Council on Foreign Relations. They favor Karl Marx as the ideal form of government, while laboring to maintain their historic presence in the global marketplace. The Leninists want to make Karl Marx's ideas happen more quickly, to include violent revolution, precluded by subversion, agitation, and internal take-over of nation after nation, until all nations are unified under a global commune and government. The Rodesians have influenced who the US President has been for the past 150 years, until now, where we have a bona fide Leninist in the White House, if anyone is wondering about the relevance of this subject to the discussion. Every Leninist revolutionary, from Lenin himself, to Mao, to Castro and Che, to Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung, to the Lao People's Democratic Republic, to the Communist Revolutionaries of the Congo, et al., have disarmed the populace before enacting a campaign of mass murder to "cleanse" the nation of capitalists. Freedom-based American capitalism is not used as a weapon, but a gift to other nations and peoples. The Old money European powers and Marxist revolutionaries use capitalism as a weapon against itself, then highlight its "failures" in their propaganda apparatchiks. They never mention how 85% of the charitable contributions to the world come from the US, or where most of the volunteer workers come from. In the instruments of deception, America is only criticized, and demonstrated to be a shining example of capitalist greed, decadence, and scorn on the world's people, in order to further their agenda of deception. New York City is not a representative of traditional American values, but a great and abominable whore, sitting on one of the greatest sea ports of the world, where the kings and rulers of the various nations meet to exchange their debased ideas and further enslavement of their people under Marxism. Bankers, such as the ones from Kuhn & Loeb, had to circumvent capitalism because it almost put them out of business with the trends in bank accounts from 1890-1910. Old European money firms had 85% of America's money in their accounts in 1890. By 1910, they had only 50%, and the market was growing in leaps and bounds, especially in small savings and loans that were spreading West in the trail of the expansionist era. That is why they convened in November of 1910 to save their businesses, by creating a shell US central bank, that was fully-controlled by the private member banks, based mainly out of Europe, with US offices along the East Coast. Paul Warburg, of Kuhn & Loeb crafted the idea of calling the scam something that would trick the stupid peasants into thinking it had the full backing of the Federal Government, with vast amounts of liquid assets or Reserves, since the peasants could only conceptualize two-word ideas at best. His proposal was to call it the "Federal Reserve", with deception fully intended. Fast-forward to the present, where instead of being ruled by these types, we now have a President who is controlled by their geographic competitors and former subjugates, namely the Chinese. The Chinese remember how the British waged the Opium Wars against them, where the East India Companies would only accept gold and silver for opium from Chinese buyers. They literally sucked the wealth from China, rendering them a hollow nation ready to be ravaged by any opportunistic adventurer, which is exactly what befell them under Imperial Japanese rule and genocide. China is doing the same thing with our market, since only cash or real assets are used to pay for illegal narcotics, and the smuggling & laundering routes exist outside of US jurisdiction for the most part, Las Vegas and Indian Tribal lands aside. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - montana - 01-28-2013 LRRP52 you have out done yourself again, this was the best , to the point assessment that I have read to date. You should be teaching history or running for office like I have stated before. My daughter is loving this . Thanks again. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - Nukes - 01-28-2013 LRRPF52 Wrote:...Freedom-based American capitalism is not used as a weapon, but a gift to other nations and peoples.... Glad that you notice their claimed versus actual loyalties. While much of your analysis is inarguable, LRRPF52, this jingoism is quite arguable, especially among those who believe that there are objective standards of right and wrong. Freedom for whom? Looting banksters? Yep. Genocidal Zionists? Yep. For the rest of us, the noose is tightening. Everyone here knows the litany of ever more pervasive and egregious abuses. I mean, really, we have "exported" so much "democracy" that we have little meaningful freedom or even privacy at home. Any meaningful discussion of problems and solutions necessarily involves one's worldview. For many of us, our worldview is religious, hence verboten here. Because of that, any discussion here can only lament symptoms and nibble around the edges of the problem. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - LRRPF52 - 01-28-2013 When I say Freedome-based American capitalism, I'm talking about the real quality of life improvements to people's lives not only in the US, but abroad, which I have witnessed personally among the 30 nations that I have traveled to or lived among. The looting banksters took advantage of the geography and economy of the United States to further their objectives, but that doesn't blanket all US economic activity and interaction between private organizations in the US and other nations. Many religious charities fall under this category, at least the ones that genuinely work to improve the lives of those in the third world. Democracy is not a form of government espoused by the Founders or the Constitution, so any exporting of the concept of democracy serves more of the Leninist "People's Republic of...." type of tyranny, disguised as being a system that serves the common man. The combined struggle of anti-American Independence European old money Marxists and eastern-world Marxists, tugging and pulling back and forth on the Individual Freedom-based American foundation, has left us with "democracy" and its accompanying reductions in freedom or privacy. This leaves us in our current state, where we are discussing our last-resort fail-safe mechanism that the Founders built into the Constitution, namely the 2nd Amendment, and the current puppet for the Eastern Marxists occupying our Presidency with his marching orders to further wipe out the last strand of the people's right to keep and bear arms, the majority of the task already having been accomplished in 1934 & 1968. The measly look-alike military small arms are just the final remainder that need to be swept away before the "GO" criteria is met for occupation and tyranny under the boot of oppression & genocide. Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - customcutter - 01-28-2013 An interesting thread with interesting ideas to research. My thoughts are that Obama is out to destroy America anyway possible. Now I'm wondering if he might induce a civil war by gun confiscation? Once civil unrest breaks out, then we will have to worry about Military and LEO. Here's an interesting video I found last week, concerning Bill Ayers a mentor of Obama's. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ Obama wants only military leaders who will agree to fire on US citizens? - smoke13 - 01-28-2013 Lrrpf52. Great commentaries. Keep them coming. If you're publishing a book. I'm buying a copy... |