+- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com)
+-- Forum: GENERAL FIREARMS DISCUSSION (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=38)
+--- Forum: Cartridges (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Thread: .224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? (/showthread.php?tid=14280)
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - Arkhangel5 - 10-21-2017
Any interest I had went right out the window with those numbers.
SY
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - Cornbread - 10-23-2017
This is what the 22 nosler should have been. The ability to shoot the longer higher bc 224 bullets is a big improvement. From a target stand point it's legit. Why not the 6mm? That is a valid point. I can only speculate on the popularity of 224 in the AR crowd versus anything 6 mm. For hunting give me a heavier bullet and at nominal ranges I'll take the Grendel. Yes folks have been wildcatting both the 6.8 and 6.5 cases for years. Whitley has the 6mmar, ARP has done 224 and 6mm on both the Grendel and 6.8 case.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - saturn - 10-27-2017
Then there is my AR15 based Olympic Arms 22-250 1 in 8, 24" that blows these silly pop guns so far away as to vanish.
70 gr TSX at 3150 kills deer very dead right now.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - LRRPF52 - 10-27-2017
Can you shoot 90gr SMK or VLD in your .22-250?
Is yours the one with the back of the magazine well cut out on the sides?
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - saturn - 10-27-2017
I can shoot any .224 bullet, as with any 22-250.
The magazine is their single stack that works perfectly.
Assume you don't own one.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - StoneHendge - 10-27-2017
Oh my. Mommy and daddy must be out to dinner and the babysitter is probably on the phone with her boyfriend.
And with that, I bow out.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - Sticks - 10-28-2017
You both probably need to take BFT's advice in the other thread that is now DOA.
Saturn - you sir are a bit short fused, abrasive and, arrogant. I've not read too many of your posts that are civil or not defensive.
Might want to step back a bit and think before you click on that "Post Reply" button.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - saturn - 10-28-2017
Hmm "sticks" why do I get called out but NOT your fellow Coloradan ? (since HE started the mud-slinging)
I, not he, owns the 22-250, that happily shoots .224 heavy bullets faster than anything available to fit on an AR 15 platform.
Mother always told me that when you DNS it's best to be silent. (See Abe Lincoln's famous quote)
Proud Curmudgeon
https://www.wikihow.com/Become-a-Curmudgeon
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - Sticks - 10-28-2017
I called you both out to heed BFT's warning.
I have more respect for Stonehenge, not just because he is living in Colorado. Read more, post less.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - saturn - 10-28-2017
Uh no, you called me a bunch of names.
Lots of Sheepies in CO.
Not up to you to tell me how often to post.
Proud Curmudgeon
https://www.wikihow.com/Become-a-Curmudgeon
"Curmudgeons do not go along with the group in order to get along. They are willing to tick everyone off to voice their stance on an issue, even if they become unpopular as a result. The old Winston Churchill quote comes to mind: “You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” "
A real sheep taken this past Tuesday.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10034[/ATTACH]
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - rabiddawg - 10-28-2017
Won’t be long now.
My ignore list finally has a member.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - bj139 - 10-28-2017
Too many rules for me to be a Curmudgeon.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - StoneHendge - 10-28-2017
That's a beut! Where is that?
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - LR1955 - 10-29-2017
saturn.
That's enough.
Go somewhere else with your problems.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - StoneHendge - 10-29-2017
Back to the actual thread - nine months later Hodgdon actually FINALLY published 22 Nosler load data. Ie, someone other than Nosler put their name on something related to the caliber. Must have been a phone call or two from Bend after Federal's announcement.
Most interesting is that they have data for mid to heavies (60 gr and up) with H4350 and IMR4451 and those actually give some of the best velocities. Nosler had no data for those, I never thought of it and although I haven't really looked in few months, no one on the World Wide Web had talked about it. I might give it one last try since I have both powders. Slower powder actually makes sense. Maybe, just maybe the slower powders change timing enough to relieve stress on the case head.....
But interestingly, they have data for 90 gr SMKs at a COAL of 2.42 with max velocities around 2750 from a 24". Obviously would require single feeding, but the 22 Nosler case at that length is going to have a lot more capacity than 224V.......
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - k1dude - 10-30-2017
NugginFutz Wrote:I couldn't help but notice that the source (Nathaniel F at TFB) chose a slick bullet for the Valkyrie, and all SMK's for the rest, so I decided I would try to re-run the numbers with an evened playing field.
I also noticed his BC for the 90 gr VLD was significantly higher than Berger's own posted G7 of 0.274, so I ran with the corrected BC.
Next, I chose a tried and true 123 Scenar for the Grendel. It is a solid choice for VLD comparisons.
Lastly, I updated the 77 grain from the SMK to Berger's Tactical/OTM, with an improved .192 G7 BC. Because the Wylde was simply the same projectile running 50 fps slower than the 22 Nosler, I omitted it entirely as being redundant.
I kept all the velocities as previously posted, and ran the numbers using the Applied Ballistics engine with standard atmospheric and temperature values. With the playing field now evened, the results are somewhat different.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9925[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9924[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9923[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9922[/ATTACH]
Even still, the Valkyrie does maintain a slight edge on drop and windage, but never gets close for retained energy at any distance.
Where did you get the 288 G7 BC for the Lapua Scenar? Lapua is claiming a 263 G7 BC.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - NugginFutz - 10-30-2017
k1dude Wrote:Where did you get the 288 G7 BC for the Lapua Scenar? Lapua is claiming a 263 G7 BC.
Well, as I sit here slightly upset with myself, I can only surmise that I fat fingered the selection from the Applied Ballistics drop down. A Lapua 136 ScenarL (next projectile down) has a .288 G7.
With apologies to the Horde, I will rerun the charts when time permits.
In the meantime, here are the correct #'s for the 123 Scenar, using Brian Litz's measured .265 G7 bc.
Good catch, K1dude.
[TABLE="width: 320"]
[TR]
[TD]Range
[/TD]
[TD]Velocity
[/TD]
[TD]Energy
[/TD]
[TD]Elevation
[/TD]
[TD]Windage
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD](y)
[/TD]
[TD](fps)
[/TD]
[TD](ft-lbs)
[/TD]
[TD](moa)
[/TD]
[TD](moa)
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]0
[/TD]
[TD]2580
[/TD]
[TD]1818
[/TD]
[TD]0
[/TD]
[TD]0
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]50
[/TD]
[TD]2496
[/TD]
[TD]1701
[/TD]
[TD]-0.14
[/TD]
[TD]0.14
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]100
[/TD]
[TD]2413
[/TD]
[TD]1590
[/TD]
[TD]-0.19
[/TD]
[TD]0.36
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]150
[/TD]
[TD]2331
[/TD]
[TD]1485
[/TD]
[TD]-1.11
[/TD]
[TD]0.57
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]200
[/TD]
[TD]2252
[/TD]
[TD]1385
[/TD]
[TD]-2.33
[/TD]
[TD]0.78
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]250
[/TD]
[TD]2174
[/TD]
[TD]1291
[/TD]
[TD]-3.72
[/TD]
[TD]1
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]300
[/TD]
[TD]2097
[/TD]
[TD]1201
[/TD]
[TD]-5.23
[/TD]
[TD]1.23
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]350
[/TD]
[TD]2022
[/TD]
[TD]1117
[/TD]
[TD]-6.85
[/TD]
[TD]1.47
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]400
[/TD]
[TD]1949
[/TD]
[TD]1037
[/TD]
[TD]-8.57
[/TD]
[TD]1.71
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]450
[/TD]
[TD]1876
[/TD]
[TD]962
[/TD]
[TD]-10.39
[/TD]
[TD]1.97
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]500
[/TD]
[TD]1805
[/TD]
[TD]890
[/TD]
[TD]-12.32
[/TD]
[TD]2.23
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]550
[/TD]
[TD]1736
[/TD]
[TD]823
[/TD]
[TD]-14.37
[/TD]
[TD]2.51
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]600
[/TD]
[TD]1667
[/TD]
[TD]760
[/TD]
[TD]-16.53
[/TD]
[TD]2.79
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]650
[/TD]
[TD]1600
[/TD]
[TD]700
[/TD]
[TD]-18.82
[/TD]
[TD]3.09
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]700
[/TD]
[TD]1534
[/TD]
[TD]643
[/TD]
[TD]-21.24
[/TD]
[TD]3.41
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]750
[/TD]
[TD]1470
[/TD]
[TD]590
[/TD]
[TD]-23.81
[/TD]
[TD]3.74
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]800
[/TD]
[TD]1406
[/TD]
[TD]540
[/TD]
[TD]-26.54
[/TD]
[TD]4.09
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]850
[/TD]
[TD]1344
[/TD]
[TD]494
[/TD]
[TD]-29.45
[/TD]
[TD]4.45
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]900
[/TD]
[TD]1284
[/TD]
[TD]450
[/TD]
[TD]-32.54
[/TD]
[TD]4.83
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]950
[/TD]
[TD]1225
[/TD]
[TD]410
[/TD]
[TD]-35.83
[/TD]
[TD]5.23
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]1000
[/TD]
[TD]1168
[/TD]
[TD]373
[/TD]
[TD]-39.35
[/TD]
[TD]5.66
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - bj139 - 10-30-2017
Doesn't this discussion belong on 224valkyrie.com?
I thought this forum was about the 6.5 Grendel or 7.62x39 variants not 6.8 SPC variants.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - JASmith - 10-31-2017
bj139 Wrote:Doesn't this discussion belong on 224valkyrie.com?Keep in mind that the Valkyrie is inevitably compared to the Grendel-based variant of the same caliber. In turn, as the OP indicated, we want to compare performance of other bullet diameters in Grendel-class cartridge lengths and powder capacities.
I thought this forum was about the 6.5 Grendel or 7.62x39 variants not 6.8 SPC variants.
So, yes, this forum is a happy place for the discussion.
.224 Valkyrie? Future competitor to the 6.5 Grendel? - LR1955 - 10-31-2017
Guys:
Unless John says otherwise, this discussion is fine and will stay.
LR55