![]() |
|
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - Printable Version +- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com) +-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL FORUM NEWS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Thread: Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) (/showthread.php?tid=14083) |
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - stanc - 09-18-2017 LRRPF52 Wrote:As to the Clinton AWB, even the corrupt scoundrels in Congress only passed the bill with a 10 year term.Yup. The 1994 AWB was not repealed. It expired. LRRPF52 Wrote:Also, look at all the headway that has been made with Concealed carry across most States.Not relevant to the situation at the Federal level. LRRPF52 Wrote:The Heller vs DC case in the SCOTUS was another major victory for freedom in the US, so the premise that all gun legislation is uni-directional favoring the communists is not supported by real events and legislation, court rulings, and judicial review.The Heller decision is a court ruling, not legislation. LRRPF52 Wrote:We also had a major win with getting rid of decades of Federal abuse with firearms carry on Federal lands.That's nice. How many Federal gun laws been repealed? Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - montana - 09-18-2017 stanc Wrote:Yup. The 1994 AWB was not repealed. It expired. Hers some legislation https://www.nraila.org/articles/20110125/no-surrender
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - stanc - 09-18-2017 montana Wrote:First of all Stan machine guns were not banned but overly taxed.:confused: I didn't say the 1934 NFA banned machine guns. Yes, the 1986 machine gun ban was on new production. But a ban is still a ban. The 1994 assault weapons ban expired because it had a fixed term. Nothing to do with non-acceptance by gun owners. If it hadn't had an expiration date, it's unlikely it would have been repealed. And none of what you wrote above negates my point: Gun owners bitched about all those laws, but "the fabric of American society" was not shattered, the laws were accepted, and life went on. montana Wrote:War is a part of politics which make politics a part of war according to Clauzwitz:Politics and war are certainly intertwined, but politics is not war. War is organized violence, death and destruction on a large scale. Lobbying for, and passing, legislation in Congress ain't any of that. Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - montana - 09-18-2017 stanc Wrote::confused: I didn't say the 1934 NFA banned machine guns. I would love to continue this but I think we have strayed a little too far from the OP, so I will end it here before I get into more trouble
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - stanc - 09-18-2017 montana Wrote:Hers some legislationLOL. The 1986 FOPA eliminated some provisions of the 1968 GCA, but did not repeal it. Worse yet, the FOPA "protected" us out of the manufacture of a whole class of firearms. Do you know what a "Pyrrhic victory" is? Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - stanc - 09-18-2017 montana Wrote:I would love to continue this but I think we have strayed a little too far from the OP, so I will end it here before I get into more troubleYeah, it's been fun -- sort of -- but I really need to stop this, too, and start doing something productive.
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - montana - 09-18-2017 stanc Wrote:LOL. The 1986 FOPA eliminated some provisions of the 1968 GCA, but did not repeal it. Yes, it is the type of victory I have debating you
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - LRRPF52 - 09-18-2017 It keeps getting page-bumped off every page that I mention it with sidebar traffic, so I'll just keep mentioning that the chief "expert witness" for the Democrats and anti-2A members of the Federal Land Use Committee was retired ATF SAC/ASAC David Chipman, who just coincidentally happens to be the lead sales rep for Shot Spotter. Shot Spotter just launched their IPO in July, and credits Chipman as their head of North American sales during a time of explosive growth. Quote:Served this nation for over 25 years in support of ATF's mission to combat violent crime. Led North American Sales for ShotSpotter during period of explosive growth while demonstrating the true nature of gun violence. Dedicated to developing, implementing and evaluating firearms violence reduction strategies aimed at making neighborhoods safe. Possessed a Top Secret SCI clearance. Quote:David H. Chipman joined SST, Inc. to expand the company's leadership in partnering with cities nationwide to fight gun violence and related crime through the use of its ShotSpotter gunfire data and intelligence. An experienced law enforcement veteran, Chipman served over 25 years in numerous executive and field agent roles at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (ATF). While at the ATF, Chipman developed, implemented and evaluated firearms violence reduction strategies aimed at making America's neighborhoods safer. These kinds of dirtbags should be banned from appearing on any hearings related to 2A unless they are subpoenaed as possible defendants, especially coming from BATFE. Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - bj139 - 09-19-2017 There seems to be resistance in Connecticut with AR owners refusing to register their ARs. The same will happen in California, I guess. Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - stanc - 09-19-2017 montana Wrote:Yes, it is the type of victory I have debating youThinks it's possible to win an internet debate...
Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - montana - 09-19-2017 LRRPF52 Wrote:It keeps getting page-bumped off every page that I mention it with sidebar traffic, so I'll just keep mentioning that the chief "expert witness" for the Democrats and anti-2A members of the Federal Land Use Committee was retired ATF SAC/ASAC David Chipman, who just coincidentally happens to be the lead sales rep for Shot Spotter. This is what you would call conflict of interest or a hostile witness. Our ding bat, alcoholic, obese, leftist mayor joined the soros funded mayors against gun violence and with the city council banned gun shows or any transfers of firearms outside dealer back ground checks within city limits even though there has never been one case where this would have prevented a crime. This meant I couldn't sell my firearm to my best friend within city limits without going through a dealer. The leftist city attorneys spent tens of thousands of dollars of tax payers money getting this passed and guaranteed it was within Montana law. It wasn't and our Montana supreme court ruled it unconstitutional under Montana law. This is another example why it is so important to get pro gun representatives elected within states and local governments. Getting state pro gun laws passed are vital to keeping our gun rights. Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - LRRPF52 - 09-19-2017 If you go to Shot Spotter's site now and search FAQs, only a 14 point list shows up, as opposed to the one I linked earlier with 16 points. http://www.shotspotter.com/faq# Congressman Duncan's office didn't even know about this aspect of the legislation and the chief witness being financially tied to a company that seems to not want to have to deal with detecting suppressors (or punctuation errors and proof-reading of their website). They do have some great webinars for influencing your elected representatives though. Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - LRRPF52 - 09-21-2017 I notified American Suppressor Association about this as well. ShotSpotter has been burning millions for the past 2 years, so the IPO seems to be a way of creating some cash infusion so they can get into the black. Nothing wrong with that, but I can see how they wouldn't want to invest millions in testing and calibration for their sensors, then re-write their firmware for the customers. They lost $6.13 million in 2015 and $6.86 million last year. You start to see how the anti-HPA chief "expert witness" and ShotSpotter's North American lead sales rep would constantly talk about how the HPA would make people's jobs much harder. Instead of open stating that it would make the work of the company he works for more difficult, he said it would make law enforcement's job more difficult, causing massive problems in fighting crime. When we see how much cash they've been hemorrhaging, I can understand his sense of urgency. Funny how things warped his mind, when suppressors are such a non issue, that even the ATF said they don't normally consider removing any of the restricted items from the unconstitutional National Registry, but in the case of suppressors, they are more than open to it because of the undue workload it causes them, as well as the fact that they only recommended prosecute 44 crimes with suppressor possession per year. Quote:Expounding upon this notion in a white paper titled Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations, Ronald Turk, the Associate Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said: Results of Sep 12th SHARE Act Legislative Hearing (Included HPA) - stanc - 10-03-2017 SHARE Act shelved indefinitely. http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/03/gop-leader-shelves-nra-backed-silencer-bill/ |