![]() |
|
TTSX OAL - Ogive Issue - Printable Version +- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com) +-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel Ammunition & Reloading (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Thread: TTSX OAL - Ogive Issue (/showthread.php?tid=219) Pages:
1
2
|
TTSX OAL - Ogive Issue - mseric - 03-29-2011 bwaites Wrote:Interesting. When I spoke to Ramshot I asked about that, and they told me there were differences. Admittedly that was a couple years ago, so something may have changed, but 2230 has been around a long time.I emailed Johan a few weeks ago and asked if indeed they were the same. Here is his reply. Steve, Yes for all practical purposes it’s the same. Therefore the same loads will apply. Regards Johan Loubser Ballistician Ramshot.Accurate Powders Tel: 406.234.0422 email: johan@ramshot.com WesternPowdersInc.Miles City.Montana. COMPANY WEBSITES/PRODUCTS: http://www.ramshot.com http://www.accuratepowder.com http://www.montanaxtreme.com http://www.blackhorn209.com TTSX OAL - Ogive Issue - bwaites - 03-29-2011 mseric Wrote:I emailed Johan a few weeks ago and asked if indeed they were the same. Here is his reply. Steve, That's really cool. He says "for all practical purposes", so I wonder what that means. Rereading my post, it sounds like I am skeptical, and I apologize. I've wondered the same about TAC and 2520 for a long time. He did tell me in the past that they used XTerm for their loads because they considered TAC a little slow for the bullet weights ideally suited to the Grendel. It gets more and more interesting! |