6.5 Grendel Forum
Muscle Memory 1 - Printable Version

+- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com)
+-- Forum: MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING FORUM (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Physical Skills (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=29)
+--- Thread: Muscle Memory 1 (/showthread.php?tid=1617)

Pages: 1 2 3


Muscle Memory 1 - Mutt - 12-06-2011

Ya know, if you have a problem with the term muscle memory, don't blame me. I didn't invent the term.


However, I know you know perfectly well what I am referring to when I use the term "muscle memory". It's a been used a long time and is an excepted term.

Enjoy.


Muscle Memory 1 - LR1955 - 12-07-2011

Mutt Wrote:Ya know, if you have a problem with the term muscle memory, don't blame me. I didn't invent the term.


However, I know you know perfectly well what I am referring to when I use the term "muscle memory". It's a been used a long time and is an excepted term.

Enjoy.

Mutt:

Sure I have problems with the term because most of the people using it do so because they have no clue what is going on with a shooter. It has become the 'your breathing is wrong' excuse for poor performance.

That is why I am interested in how people define the term.

You relayed the saying that it takes 7000 repetitions of X to induce this muscle memory so I asked why 7K? Maybe you know or maybe you heard something that actually makes sense.

LR55


Muscle Memory 1 - Mutt - 12-08-2011

LR,

I can see where you are coming from. I'm just so used to hearing and using the term in the same context and probably automatically assume everyone knows the term for what I know it for. But, I guess that isn't always the case. I can see where a term like that gets thrown out and passed along enough time to muddle and confuse the meaning and intent. I bet it gets thrown around rather loosely over on ARFCOM (I don't go there anymore).

When I was in law enforcement, they hammered us hard with muscle memory. Where it came into play the most was when drawing from a holster, aiming and shooting accurately. The same was true for shotgun and rifle. First teach the correct weapon ready carry position (low ready), then practice the shoulder, aim, sweep the safety, front sight press, cycle, reload (or mag change) etc. With pistol, it was always ..... Slow is smooth and smooth is fast. We would practice the same motions over and over. Snap, draw, clear, point, stance, front sight, press (the trigger), reload, repeat. They wanted us to be able to draw and get on target without much thought. Bascially reacting to circumstances. I also taught for some time. In most of the curiculum, it taught about muscle memory and that's where the 7000 repetitions came from. I can't remember all the curiculum, put alot still sticks with me. I'm pretty sure almost all the information actaully came from FBI statistics, since most training curiculum are based on current FBI training, stats and case study. All of which crosses over to much of the firearms training I've either participated in, taught or attended. So, when I teach someone how to shoot (in civilian life), I usually teach them the basics first and explain to them why it is so important to be able to repeat the act over and over. That way, once they do develope better marksmanship it's easier to reproduce results, since the basic principles are already automatic.

Why 7000??? ...... No idea, that's just what they taught. Not sure who came up with it. But, if you know anyone that's ever taught at FLETC (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center ..... they teach the FBI, DOD, Secret Service etc. academy) they mave have a better idea. I bet if you emailed or mailed them about any info they may have on muscle memory, they may help you out.

I'm not saying anyone here is wrong. Some of the posts are a little beyond basics though.


ETA: Here's a decent article ............ http://www.actiontarget.com/tactical-training-tips-key-points-for-instructors-shooters/

Here's another one ............. http://www.policeone.com/columnists/RaymondFoster1/articles/125206-Triggering-muscle-memory/

This is a pretty good example ..... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6047584224871136293#


Muscle Memory 1 - bwaites - 12-12-2011

[INDENT]Gentleman, one of the reasons that we invited LR1955 to serve as the Marksmanship Moderator was because of his vast experience training and coaching military and civilian shooters.

Although he is retired from the Army, he is anything BUT a conventional "the Army way is the ONLY way" thinker. He has evaluated what has worked to teach and coach, and some of his ideas may not fit what has come to be thought of as the "conventional" teaching and coaching method.

He is very open to ACTUAL performance enhancing techniques, and his posts here are often of the "evaluate your sacred cow and see if it REALLY is the best way" nature. His purpose is to make YOU evaluate what you do and decide if it might be done better in a different way.

Although he is somewhat brusque in his writing at times, his intent is to make you think through your points, and defend them with sound argument, so that the results you talk about can be repeated by others.

When he questions you, it is not because he thinks you don't know what you are talking about, but because he wants you to clarify what your thought process is so that less experienced shooters can duplicate what you do if at all possible, IF IT WORKS!

Having spent many hours with LR1955, and having watched several hundred new shooters learn from him and his staff, I appreciate his ability to get people who have never shot at any significant distance to accomplish things they never thought possible.

Is his way the ONLY way? Of course not! But he will make you evaluate what works and why, and that is his purpose.

Please continue to contribute, since many have minimal experience at this kind of shooting, and every idea might have some merit. Re-examine what your "sacred cows" are, and see if there isn't something you can do to improve your shooting, or help with a newbie! [/INDENT]


Muscle Memory 1 - Harvest123 - 11-07-2012

Muscle memory, as I understand it, is related to repetition of movement. The Term "muscle memory" is a misnomer. No muscles have memory. The brain in conjunction with the rest of the body learn repetitive motions so that they come more easily. Kinda a Darwinian thing. Typing is an ideal example of "muscle memory." Takes time and a lot of initial effort and repitition. Yes, neurons are attached to the mucsles that move the body, but it is the strengthening of the motions via repetition that helps the police or military or citizen that make us quicker, more accurate, etc.

What I leaned in school, and what has helped me in many things I do. Like they say, How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice, practice.


Muscle Memory 1 - Harvest123 - 11-07-2012

One more thing. State of mind and awareness are also a form or "muscle memory" with no muscles. When you are trained to be "situationally aware" it has nothing to do with muscles. You learn patterns of your surroundings, sounds, sight, etc that Spec ops are masters of. Police are the same way on the street. Small indicators let them know where the bad guy is and what he is doing. Just wanted to throw that in.


Muscle Memory 1 - Kleinerk - 09-21-2015

I thought the same thing, Patrick. I still remember a sports science show claiming muscle memory was the reason a basketball player could sink shots blindfolded. Now there“s a scientific answer for you.


Muscle Memory 1 - SG4247 - 09-21-2015

I am acquainted with a former Olympic shooter who went through some extensive leading edge training.

When I asked him what his secret to accurate shooting was and he said simply, "1000 dry fires a day".

I was floored. That is a quite a lot of practice!

That's how important practice and repetition was considered at that time.


Muscle Memory 1 - Klem - 09-21-2015

My take on this concept is a psychology term called 'scripting'. I do not believe muscles have memories however our brain does. All knowledge, and specifically behavioural or action beliefs are stored not only in schemas but within schemas, there are scripts. These are efficiency mechanisms that allow us to navigate through life without having to figure things out for the first time, every time.

For example, driving a car. The first time is full of stress and clumsiness. We are connecting disparate knowledge in organised patterns to achieve a sequential task. In time and with practise by evoking these scripts we can not only drive efficiently but multi-task while driving, eating, thinking, listening to music, almost effortlessly. Through repetition we hone our scripts which are constructed neural connections allowing us to act/behave. Opening a door without thinking about how to do it the first time. Immediate action drills when the weapon stops almost as if we are not thinking. The more repetition (practise) we do the more precise our scripts will be - the more fluid our motions will be, the more likely our body will be in the correct posture, and the less we are required to concentrate on performing the sequenced behaviour.

Perform a physical task often enough and we can almost convince ourselves it is automatic and without cognition. But it is still our brain thinking it through just acting with more precision and more efficiently by evoking honed scripts.


Muscle Memory 1 - LR1955 - 09-21-2015

SG4247 Wrote:I am acquainted with a former Olympic shooter who went through some extensive leading edge training.

When I asked him what his secret to accurate shooting was and he said simply, "1000 dry fires a day".

I was floored. That is a quite a lot of practice!

That's how important practice and repetition was considered at that time.

SG:

1K dry fires a day? I wonder who keeps count.

Maybe an Olympian but even then, difficult for me to believe. That would be about six or eight hours of dry firing.

I use a SCATT Biathlon machine for dry firing. I try to go 15 strings prone and 15 standing per session. Takes me about 90 minutes and that is rapid fires. I imagine slow fire would take about six or eight hours for 1K rounds if the shooter would not go catatonic from sheer boredom after about two hours of it. The most important strings to me are 1 - 4 then 14 and 15.

There are other things a person can do if they want to spend time. Visualization sessions between dry firing strings is a good one. Bottom line though, 1K dry fires a day is about 700 more than needed. Maybe 800 in terms of slow fire. However, could well be that is how they trained or maybe even train today. Personally, I think it is way too much and will lead to burn out.


Muscle Memory 1 - SG4247 - 09-21-2015

LR1955 Wrote:SG:

1K dry fires a day? I wonder who keeps count.

Maybe an Olympian but even then, difficult for me to believe. That would be about six or eight hours of dry firing.

I use a SCATT Biathlon machine for dry firing. I try to go 15 strings prone and 15 standing per session. Takes me about 90 minutes and that is rapid fires. I imagine slow fire would take about six or eight hours for 1K rounds if the shooter would not go catatonic from sheer boredom after about two hours of it. The most important strings to me are 1 - 4 then 14 and 15.

There are other things a person can do if they want to spend time. Visualization sessions between dry firing strings is a good one. Bottom line though, 1K dry fires a day is about 700 more than needed. Maybe 800 in terms of slow fire. However, could well be that is how they trained or maybe even train today. Personally, I think it is way too much and will lead to burn out.

Seems like a lot to me as well. They trained all day, everyday, and did basically nothing else but eat and sleep. No job, and no distractions. I know that I would last about 30 min!

He was at the Team USA Colorado Springs Olympic training facility, which still trains for Olympic shooting today.

http://www.teamusa.org/About-the-USOC/Training-Centers-and-Sites/Colorado-Springs


Muscle Memory 1 - Vasux86 - 02-04-2016

I have been chewing on this topic for a while and have some thoughts to share.

I'll begin by explaining how this relates to motor plans for complex movements. A motor plan is a complex set of muscle movements that includes the information necessary to orchestrate some movement. The big factors are properly timed amplitude and direction of movement. Imagine all the activity that takes place when you perform a "simple" task such as drawing from a holster. It begins with your brain sending a signal down the spinal cord to execute some motor behavior (e.g., "bend shoulder at some angle, bend elbow at some angle, move thumb to some position, etc."). When the muscle groups receive the motor command, your body is sending feedback to the brain about whether or not the movement is on track (e.g., "elbow is too far back"). Your brain has to integrate this feedback and make corrections or continue with the motor behavior as prescribed. This is a constant feedback loop including motor neurons, sensory neurons, and the brain/spinal cord. Needless to say, complex movements can place an incredible demand on our limited cognitive resources, especially if the movements are unfamiliar and the brain is trying to simultaneously create a motor plan, execute a motor behavior, and integrate feedback. Difficulty is proportional to rate of execution, which causes errors when a new behavior is performed quickly. Hence the phrase- slow is smooth and smooth is fast. That being said, when some behavior is practiced, especially at a slow rate with minimal variability (more on that in a minute), it increases the rate at which one develops a motor plan. A motor plan minimizes variability (i.e., error), which decreases the need to make corrections to some movement and increases the rate at which the behavior can be performed. This also minimizes the use of the limited cognitive resources available at some point in time. Those cognitive resources can then be delegated for use elsewhere. So by practicing some behavior, we are providing the nervous system an opportunity to develop motor plans that are necessary for optimal performance. For more on this, read about how top athletes use focused practice to increase performance.

Secondly, the number of repetitions required to develop a motor plan depends on many factors. Assuming that it requires some set number of repetitions is impossible. For instance, repeating a movement more consistently develops a motor plan more quickly. It allows the brain to "learn" the movement quicker because there is less variability. With less variability there is less need for your brain to figure out what exactly it is supposed to do when it executes some movement. Also, some people are just naturally built to develop motor plans more quickly. We probably all know someone who is blessed with the ability to be explained how to do something, try it a few times, and then is able to execute the movement consistently much quicker than others. The rate at which a person develops a motor plan also depends on various other biological factors- nutrition, how rested the person is, whether the person is distracted by external or internal stimuli at the time of learning, etc. There's more to be said on this, but the main point is that there is too much variability in the environment and biology to say that it requires some set number of repetitions to develop a motor plan or to consider a person to have developed "muscle memory."

In the words of Mr. Gump, that's all I've got to say about that. Cheers.


Muscle Memory 1 - LR1955 - 02-05-2016

Vasux86 Wrote:I have been chewing on this topic for a while and have some thoughts to share.

I'll begin by explaining how this relates to motor plans for complex movements. A motor plan is a complex set of muscle movements that includes the information necessary to orchestrate some movement. The big factors are properly timed amplitude and direction of movement. Imagine all the activity that takes place when you perform a "simple" task such as drawing from a holster. It begins with your brain sending a signal down the spinal cord to execute some motor behavior (e.g., "bend shoulder at some angle, bend elbow at some angle, move thumb to some position, etc."). When the muscle groups receive the motor command, your body is sending feedback to the brain about whether or not the movement is on track (e.g., "elbow is too far back"). Your brain has to integrate this feedback and make corrections or continue with the motor behavior as prescribed. This is a constant feedback loop including motor neurons, sensory neurons, and the brain/spinal cord. Needless to say, complex movements can place an incredible demand on our limited cognitive resources, especially if the movements are unfamiliar and the brain is trying to simultaneously create a motor plan, execute a motor behavior, and integrate feedback. Difficulty is proportional to rate of execution, which causes errors when a new behavior is performed quickly. Hence the phrase- slow is smooth and smooth is fast. That being said, when some behavior is practiced, especially at a slow rate with minimal variability (more on that in a minute), it increases the rate at which one develops a motor plan. A motor plan minimizes variability (i.e., error), which decreases the need to make corrections to some movement and increases the rate at which the behavior can be performed. This also minimizes the use of the limited cognitive resources available at some point in time. Those cognitive resources can then be delegated for use elsewhere. So by practicing some behavior, we are providing the nervous system an opportunity to develop motor plans that are necessary for optimal performance. For more on this, read about how top athletes use focused practice to increase performance.

Secondly, the number of repetitions required to develop a motor plan depends on many factors. Assuming that it requires some set number of repetitions is impossible. For instance, repeating a movement more consistently develops a motor plan more quickly. It allows the brain to "learn" the movement quicker because there is less variability. With less variability there is less need for your brain to figure out what exactly it is supposed to do when it executes some movement. Also, some people are just naturally built to develop motor plans more quickly. We probably all know someone who is blessed with the ability to be explained how to do something, try it a few times, and then is able to execute the movement consistently much quicker than others. The rate at which a person develops a motor plan also depends on various other biological factors- nutrition, how rested the person is, whether the person is distracted by external or internal stimuli at the time of learning, etc. There's more to be said on this, but the main point is that there is too much variability in the environment and biology to say that it requires some set number of repetitions to develop a motor plan or to consider a person to have developed "muscle memory."

In the words of Mr. Gump, that's all I've got to say about that. Cheers.

Vasux:

Certainly a good theoretical explanation. No argument with the concept at all.

So, now the hard part. Applying it.

If you wish, what can someone apply from your comments that will make them a better marksman?

LR55


Muscle Memory 1 - Vasux86 - 02-05-2016

LR1955 Wrote:Vasux:

Certainly a good theoretical explanation. No argument with the concept at all.

So, now the hard part. Applying it.

If you wish, what can someone apply from your comments that will make them a better marksman?

LR55

I am not aware of any studies that have been done to apply the concepts I shared directly to marksmanship. However, one of the things that has been shown to be improve performance with top athletes is visualization. Stanford ran a study a few years ago with their gymnast. They had one group that went through some regiment where they visualized themselves completing a new movement. Another group did not do any visualization. Athletes in both groups then later performed the movement. The gymnast that visualized themselves successfully completing the movement had higher scores and, get this, increased flexibility. This study, among others, points to the impact the brain can have on motor behavior. I say all that to say that the role of the brain in executing a movement cannot be overstated.

I have not done any research on this topic myself, just gathered information from other sources. From what I have read and shared with you though, it would make the most sense to set up the conditions to enhance learning of some behavior (the motor plan). This could be done by minimizing external and internal distractions, breaking complex movement into segments and later integrating them, beginning learning slowly, and making the behavior as consistent and conspicuous as possible. Visualization is apparently helpful as well. Put simply, minimize variability between repetitions while maximizing the focus on each repetition.

If this doesn't answer your question, would you be able to provide more details about what exactly your trying to figure out? I may be missing the target here, pun intended.


Muscle Memory 1 - Vasux86 - 02-05-2016

LR1955 Wrote:What is 'muscle memory' and how does your muscle know if it is memorizing the right thing?

LR1955

"Muscle memory" is, put simply, the motor plan that I presented in my earlier discussion. There is really no way your body knows whether it is memorizing the "right" thing, it just remember what you do. One thing your body can do is recognize whether it is doing the "right" thing, meaning the motor plan. Your body makes this determination based on various feedback loops of sensory information. In the case of shooting, you can see when your shots are not hitting your aiming point. This is an example of one piece of feedback your body integrates to determine whether or not it is doing the right thing.


Muscle Memory 1 - LR1955 - 02-05-2016

Vasux86 Wrote:I am not aware of any studies that have been done to apply the concepts I shared directly to marksmanship. However, one of the things that has been shown to be improve performance with top athletes is visualization. Stanford ran a study a few years ago with their gymnast. They had one group that went through some regiment where they visualized themselves completing a new movement. Another group did not do any visualization. Athletes in both groups then later performed the movement. The gymnast that visualized themselves successfully completing the movement had higher scores and, get this, increased flexibility. This study, among others, points to the impact the brain can have on motor behavior. I say all that to say that the role of the brain in executing a movement cannot be overstated.

I have not done any research on this topic myself, just gathered information from other sources. From what I have read and shared with you though, it would make the most sense to set up the conditions to enhance learning of some behavior (the motor plan). This could be done by minimizing external and internal distractions, breaking complex movement into segments and later integrating them, beginning learning slowly, and making the behavior as consistent and conspicuous as possible. Visualization is apparently helpful as well. Put simply, minimize variability between repetitions while maximizing the focus on each repetition.

If this doesn't answer your question, would you be able to provide more details about what exactly your trying to figure out? I may be missing the target here, pun intended.

Vas:

Goals Setting, Imagery / Imagery Scripts, Self Talk, Attentional Focus, Relaxation Techniques -- all work. The problem that I see with many people is that they rarely use any of the Performance Enhancement / Mental Skills techniques in training and so they aren't prepared to use them in competition when it strikes them that they may be of value. Personally I view any of these techniques as a means of focusing attention on the right thing at the right time. It is kind of a survival technique providing the person knows his attention is wandering and that in order to succeed they must focus on the task again. To me this can mean a conscious focus on doing the task (which will be very slow) or simply to push some unnecessary thought out of the conscious and replace it with the thoughts that are necessary to succeed. It is not particularly hard to push a negative thought out of the conscious mind and replace it with something more beneficial to successfully accomplishing a task. The hard part is more likely to be able to focus on a single correct thing done at the right amount of energy (arousal) that allows the body to function without interference from the brain. There are areas where a person can do very well at a task but when they are outside of that zone due primarily to counterproductive thoughts or emotions, the chances of them doing very well disappear and good performance becomes luck more than deliberate.

Anyway, that is my view but to get to your theory, certainly someone can use it to their benefit. This would be by performing the task at a pace where the movements are done as perfectly as possible with feedback from a coach or the person. I have also found out that in order to do so, it pays for the coach or trainer to ensure the person knows what right is. This is where people can really move apart in training concepts. I push what success is, looks like, and how it is quantified or qualified. The goal is to do well, to succeed, even if success is rare at the outset of learning a skill. Of course once they know what success is, they are more prepared to focus their attention on attaining success.

Others tend to focus on physical action -- the movements that they think must take place for the end state to happen. One size fits all approach. It has its advantages in that it is easy to get a large group of people to a mediocre level of performance such as the military. It is poor because it forces people to do something that their body may not be too good at doing for various physical reasons. And, it normally emphasizes a strict process as more important than result. Plus it tends to focus on failure rather than success. The shooter looks in wonderment when he does everything he thinks must be done but misses time and again. This is because he was never taught to succeed, only to act.

So, certainly a person can take your comments and use them to their benefit. Just that slow can be smooth but slow can also be slow. That's why most of the marksmanship problems faced by people on the Forum are because they do not shoot fast enough when they are testing loads. They need to understand that going slow allows the brain time to consciously input its opinion into the shots. So, guy either gets ahead of the trigger or behind the trigger but either way, they tend to do poorly. Then they go to LRRP52 wondering what is wrong with their barrel, optic, trigger, loads. He, he.

Off to my sport for the weekend so be good!

LR55


Muscle Memory 1 - LRRPF52 - 02-05-2016

I think has a lot to do with why I find shooting on a cadence with only focus on a few things allows me to shoot in the .3's to .5's for 5rd groups.

I use the integrated act of hold control when doing that, which blends sight picture, breathing, and trigger control into one fundamental.

It only works with a very well-settled position that has the Natural Point of Aim oriented into the smallest center of my aiming point.


Muscle Memory 1 - Vasux86 - 02-08-2016

LR1955 Wrote:Vas:

Goals Setting, Imagery / Imagery Scripts, Self Talk, Attentional Focus, Relaxation Techniques -- all work. The problem that I see with many people is that they rarely use any of the Performance Enhancement / Mental Skills techniques in training and so they aren't prepared to use them in competition when it strikes them that they may be of value. Personally I view any of these techniques as a means of focusing attention on the right thing at the right time. It is kind of a survival technique providing the person knows his attention is wandering and that in order to succeed they must focus on the task again. To me this can mean a conscious focus on doing the task (which will be very slow) or simply to push some unnecessary thought out of the conscious and replace it with the thoughts that are necessary to succeed. It is not particularly hard to push a negative thought out of the conscious mind and replace it with something more beneficial to successfully accomplishing a task. The hard part is more likely to be able to focus on a single correct thing done at the right amount of energy (arousal) that allows the body to function without interference from the brain. There are areas where a person can do very well at a task but when they are outside of that zone due primarily to counterproductive thoughts or emotions, the chances of them doing very well disappear and good performance becomes luck more than deliberate.

Anyway, that is my view but to get to your theory, certainly someone can use it to their benefit. This would be by performing the task at a pace where the movements are done as perfectly as possible with feedback from a coach or the person. I have also found out that in order to do so, it pays for the coach or trainer to ensure the person knows what right is. This is where people can really move apart in training concepts. I push what success is, looks like, and how it is quantified or qualified. The goal is to do well, to succeed, even if success is rare at the outset of learning a skill. Of course once they know what success is, they are more prepared to focus their attention on attaining success.

Others tend to focus on physical action -- the movements that they think must take place for the end state to happen. One size fits all approach. It has its advantages in that it is easy to get a large group of people to a mediocre level of performance such as the military. It is poor because it forces people to do something that their body may not be too good at doing for various physical reasons. And, it normally emphasizes a strict process as more important than result. Plus it tends to focus on failure rather than success. The shooter looks in wonderment when he does everything he thinks must be done but misses time and again. This is because he was never taught to succeed, only to act.

So, certainly a person can take your comments and use them to their benefit. Just that slow can be smooth but slow can also be slow. That's why most of the marksmanship problems faced by people on the Forum are because they do not shoot fast enough when they are testing loads. They need to understand that going slow allows the brain time to consciously input its opinion into the shots. So, guy either gets ahead of the trigger or behind the trigger but either way, they tend to do poorly. Then they go to LRRP52 wondering what is wrong with their barrel, optic, trigger, loads. He, he.

Off to my sport for the weekend so be good!

LR55

I commend you for your critical thinking skills. Thank you for taking the time to challenge some of the thoughts so many shooters have been taught. It's clear that you have much more experience in coaching than I do. However, I can offer some thoughts based on my experience in shooting, limited coaching, and knowledge/experience in psychology.

First off, I am of the mindset that if something works (i.e., performance enhancement techniques), shooters need to do it. It doesn't matter if they are too lazy or confident to apply them enough in practice. If it works, it should be done. Shooting for practice is about building skills, not ego. Therefore, I believe that a lazy shooter does not preclude one from teaching performance enhancement techniques to help shooters succeed. It's like any other skill (i.e., trigger finger discipline), it only works if you use it. So maybe it comes back to selling the fundamental skills to shooters in training. Making sure they understand and appreciate the value of what they are learning.

Also, I really like your approach to coaching. It is important to understand what success looks like, and especially how to produce it. The best coaches I have had have taught me how to think about success and what I am doing to achieve it.

RE: slow being smooth and smooth being fast. This is just one step in the training process. It is important when your brain is learning a motor plan to go through it slowly because it minimizes error, which increases learning. As the motor plan is developed and practiced, speed will naturally increase. Similar to the notion that you have to crawl before you can walk, walk before you can run. Someone with limited experience trying to perform speed reloads is just ugly. It makes me want to look away. It's like an 8-month-old trying to run a 40. Skills have to be built up slowly and consistently before someone can perform a complex task quickly.


Muscle Memory 1 - LRRPF52 - 02-08-2016

For those that don't know, LR1955 has basically a lifetime of shooting and coaching experience coming from NRA High Power, retired from Army Special Forces (he was the OIC of 1st Special Forces Group's SOTIC Committee), and spent many years helping train the trainers and snipers/DMs from Panama in the 1970's (he was a Recon Platoon Leader down in the Canal Zone), all the way to the Stryker Brigades at Fort Lewis during OIF.

He also did his Master's Degree in Sports Training Psychology if I remember correctly, and is a wealth of information when it comes down to the minutia of brain-organ interface, feedback, and performance-based physiology, but he balances it well with a heavy leaning towards the blunt reality of keeping things simple that actually work, without going into the detail that he could.

Basically, when you ask what time it is, he just tells you, instead of how to build a watch. He could tell you how to build the watch, but he knows that most of the time, that isn't helpful for the discussion, as it will distract from what the intent is at the time.


Muscle Memory 1 - Vasux86 - 02-08-2016

LRRPF52 Wrote:For those that don't know, LR1955 has basically a lifetime of shooting and coaching experience coming from NRA High Power, retired from Army Special Forces (he was the OIC of 1st Special Forces Group's SOTIC Committee), and spent many years helping train the trainers and snipers/DMs from Panama in the 1970's (he was a Recon Platoon Leader down in the Canal Zone), all the way to the Stryker Brigades at Fort Lewis during OIF.

He also did his Master's Degree in Sports Training Psychology if I remember correctly, and is a wealth of information when it comes down to the minutia of brain-organ interface, feedback, and performance-based physiology, but he balances it well with a heavy leaning towards the blunt reality of keeping things simple that actually work, without going into the detail that he could.

Basically, when you ask what time it is, he just tells you, instead of how to build a watch. He could tell you how to build the watch, but he knows that most of the time, that isn't helpful for the discussion, as it will distract from what the intent is at the time.

I knew he was in the Who's Who of the shooting world, but didn't know all those details. Even more of an honor to be engaged in a discussion with him.