Hybrid employees
Collapse
X
-
Heh. Some of us already are — or soon will be — "hybrid" employees in our various workplaces.
Funny how the "real" world dictates practical policies that 2A supporters have long "theoretically" advocated: the right to keep and bear arms.:: 6.5 GRENDEL Deer and Targets :: 6mmARC Targets and Varmints and Deer :: 22 ARC Varmints and Targets
:: I Drank the Water :: Revelation 21:6 ::
-
-
Originally posted by BluntForceTrauma View PostHeh. Some of us already are — or soon will be — "hybrid" employees in our various workplaces.
Funny how the "real" world dictates practical policies that 2A supporters have long "theoretically" advocated: the right to keep and bear arms.
In QT stores, only the so-called hybrid employees -- "people with the qualifications and credentials at the law enforcement-level" -- are allowed to be armed.
QT is copying the same government practice that 2A supporters object to. The only real difference is it's at the corporate level, as opposed to state and local.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by stanc View PostNot even close. What 2A supporters have long advocated is allowing everybody to be armed.
In QT stores, only the so-called hybrid employees -- "people with the qualifications and credentials at the law enforcement-level" -- are allowed to be armed.
QT is copying the same government practice that 2A supporters object to. The only real difference is it's at the corporate level, as opposed to state and local.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by montana View PostActually Stan, I don't really disagree with you on the training part.
Originally posted by montanaIf the concerned anti's proposed a real training course with x amount of rounds to be shot monthly on a realistic training course, I would support it. There is a big difference between skilled shooters and the occasional tin can shooter. That said, those same qualified shooters should be able to carry anywhere a law enfocement officers could with the same type of restrictions, like no alcohol.Last edited by stanc; 11-14-2018, 02:02 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by stanc View PostThere seems to be a bit of a misunderstanding. I have not advocated any training requirement. It is the QuikTrip corporation that has a training requirement.
Are you saying that you think the right to bear arms should be infringed, that only people who are government-approved should be able to legally be armed?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by montana View PostI think everybody has the right to be armed, period. I do think mandatory training and instruction would not infringe on anybodies right to bear arms.
Originally posted by montanaI had to pass hunter safety at age 12, "which is the basic's of firearm safety" before I could legally hunt.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by stanc View PostSecond sentence contradicts the first. People who refuse to take the government-mandated training and instruction could not legally exercise their "right" to be armed.
Originally posted by stanc View PostA perfect example of government control of a supposed right.Last edited by montana; 11-14-2018, 07:45 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by montana View PostNo, it only applies to minors.
Originally posted by bj139 View PostThere is no right to hunt in the Constitution.
Comment
-
Comment