Scope issues - vertical adjustment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jdelong
    Warrior
    • Feb 2017
    • 133

    Scope issues - vertical adjustment

    Experts, your help would be appreciated.

    Backstory: I have an 18" Odin barrel and have successfully completed a 1K shooting class with it. Rifle functions great, mostly suppressed, reliability is great. I started the class with a Weaver Tactical 6-30X FFP scope (Natchez was clearing them out at $750, great glass, built like a tank, on a 34mm Aero SPR mount). Shot first day (pre-class, just messing around with instructors there to do wind calls) and got on an 8" gong at 1K yards over two big valleys with crazy wind (all due to instructor's wind calls). at 1K, the hold was around 13mils. I ran the Hornandy American Gunner 123gr rounds for the whole class and is what I shoot now.

    Second day, I had the vertical turret stop working/fail. We verified that was the problem as the instructor loaned me his Bushnell Elite Tactical DMRII 3.5-21 scope on a LaRue standard QD mount. I finished the class with that scope and continued to make hits at 1K repeatedly. I sent the Bushnell back and my option was another one, or $750 credit to Natchez. I opted for the latter and hoped to put that towards the Bushnell HDMR. No dice since Natchez does/did not carry them. I opted for the Vortex PST Gen2 5-25X with EBR-2C reticle. I ran the Bushnell at 18-20X, so i figured this would be plenty. I had an Aero 30mm SPR mount hanging out, so am using that.

    Fast forward to site-in with the AG 123gr (same ammo). I followed the instructions for the zero stop, got it all sited in. I then tried to dial up to see what is left on the dial - 8mils; not enough to go to 1K. I re-zeroed, same result. I then bought a 20MOA base from Weaver, mounted it, determined it messed up my cheek weld, added some foam, took it out to site in. Followed instructions again for zero stop. Bottomed out the turret as low as it will go, and at 75Y (as far as I could go that day), I was 12"+ above center. So, I cannot go "low" enough on the elevation to get a zero likely at 100Y and maybe not even 200Y (? - have not tried it, but prefer a 100Y).

    I took off the 20MOA base, repeated zeroing, same deal, only 8mil left.

    In hindsight, I definitely was able to dial 13mils on the Weaver and the Bushnell. I did not test to see how much more there was, but I know for a fact I did not run out of vertical on either scope.

    I compared the specs of the Weaver to the Vortex for vertical adjustment (80MOA (~24MIL) for Weaver, 20MRAD for Vortex, 34MIL for Bushnell).

    If my math is correct, the delta b/t the Weaver and Vortex is around 4MIL, which comes close but does not explain getting 13MIL on the Weaver. The Bushnell is self explanatory. The Weaver and Vortex were/are both using Aero SPR mounts, one in 34mm, the other 30mm. I guess I can just write it off as "whatever" since I don't have the Weaver any longer, but I would like to solve my issue with the Vortex (without 20MOA, stuck at 8 mil, with 20MOA base, i seemingly can't zero at 100Y and I have to add a foam spacer to get proper eye relief).

    My choices appear to be:
    1. live with 8MIL knowing that I won't get out to 1K that often, and I guess I can try to dial 8 and hold 5 in the reticle. Or similar. 8MIL, based on my dope chart gets me about 700Y give or take.
    2. go with the 20MOA base and see what the shortest zero I can get is and figure out adjustments for less distance.
    3. get rid of the vortex and find something with more vertical adjustment.

    The reality is most shooting will be done inside 700Y, but like to get out to long range classes 1-2 times a year.

    Would appreciate input; hopefully I am doing something stupid. Feel free to point it out! This is the first time I've used a 20MOA base, so who knows. I posted at AR15.com and yes, I am sure I don't have it on backwards and I am sure the rifle works properly having been to several long distance classes.

    Thanks!
  • kpswihart
    Warrior
    • Dec 2016
    • 212

    #2
    Can you post photos of your setup?

    Comment

    • CastorTroy
      Warrior
      • Mar 2015
      • 133

      #3
      another option would be a larue 10moa scope base.

      Comment

      • Klem
        Chieftain
        • Aug 2013
        • 3570

        #4
        jd,

        I do think you are setting yourself an impossible task by choosing scopes that have a small vertical range.

        In your shoes I would first look at the ballistic curves for your gun to find out what elevation it takes to get to where you want to shoot. Then look at scopes that will let you do this, with or without a canted base. If you still can't get the elevation you want then a lesser preferred fix is to use the max elevation the elevation adjustment will give you and then add to it the graduations on the reticle to give you that extra range.

        By my calculation you need about 14Mils or 50MOA of elevation to be comfortable at where the bullet goes subsonic, around 1,000yds. To see what the scope can give you need to halve the elevation range, so in a 20Mil scope (Vortex) you have half up and half down...10Mils of elevation and 10 Mils of declination. Now you need another 4Mils of elevation to get to 14Mils. If you put a 20MOA (6Mils) angled base that theoretically changes the scope axis to 16Mils up and 4Mils down. That's if the scope axis is exactly half up and half down and that depends on how precise they put it together at the factory. You tend to get what you pay for in scope quality and precision. Theoretically, it should be doable with your Vortex scope and a 20MOA base. But you haven't left much slack in the system for alignment errors and that may be what is happening in your case. The scope's reticle-range may not be exactly aligned centre to the scope's axis/body.

        There are scopes out there better suited for your situation with more elevation range.

        Comment

        • jdelong
          Warrior
          • Feb 2017
          • 133

          #5
          all - thanks! Yes, I think maybe the 10MOA splits the baby and would hopefully get me to a 100Y zero.

          Klem - you nailed it. The issue was, embarrassingly, I learned what I need after the fact. It did not help that without knowing what I needed allowed me to succeed . I did it all backwards (bought the scope first and it worked for my needs, then used another one that "just worked." You confirmed my options (dial + hold with existing setup, fiddle around with base/zero, or new scope) and I appreciate it.

          I am now really considering picking up one of the Bushnell 3.5-21's as I really like the size (it is compact), the glass, and the H59.

          I wanted to make sure I have flushed out all of the problem and am on the right track with my list of options. I suppose since I do have the base, I could take it out to see if I can get a 200Y zero with it and what the adjustments look like for sub 200 (hunting distances). If I go that route, I have to do something to adjust for the height (foam pad on stock is not ideal).

          First world problems...I'd love if anyone has any recommendations on a scope (sub $2K range, $1500 is better that has the vertical needed or a more elegant stock solution for proper alignment with a base.

          I am also wondering about a scope with built in base maybe meets the issue a bit better? Right now I am "stacking" the base plus mount. I see Larue has a 20MOA QD (LT112). Wondering if that might be the best of both worlds (base plus not needing as much foam pad for proper eye alignment)? There are others out there that are 20MOA built into the mount. I just don't want to throw $250 at it each time to see if it works

          Thanks again!

          Comment

          • Sticks
            Chieftain
            • Dec 2016
            • 1922

            #6
            Odin barrel, so this is an AR.

            I have 3 uppers (PF Billet, and Vltor Monolithic & MUR1A) that are running Nightforce Ultralight 1 piece 20 MOA bases - 1.5", and Vortex Viper PST (G1) 6-24x Mrad, EBR2C (one with a 2.5-10). I have had no problem getting zeroed at 100, still plenty of turret left.

            I run the same lower with a Magpul PRS on both, but have a Luth AR adjustable on a second lower. I have no problem with cheek weld on either, but LOP is my issue....on all my rifles.

            Something is not right if you are hitting 12" high with a 20 MOA base and ran out of turret.
            Last edited by Sticks; 11-19-2018, 11:06 AM.
            Sticks

            Catchy sig line here.

            Comment

            • Klem
              Chieftain
              • Aug 2013
              • 3570

              #7
              jd,

              Can you please post a photo or two of the setup that's causing you problems with 12" high and cheek weld. What's the height of the scope axis from the top of the rail?

              Comment

              • jdelong
                Warrior
                • Feb 2017
                • 133

                #8
                i took the base off, so I am now back to the aero mount on the rail, so I don't think there is anything to look at there. Will try to get some time this week to put the base back on and snap a picture. Thanks!

                Sticks - I bottomed out the turret per the zero-stop instructions when I had the 20MOA base on it and was 10-12" high at 75Y (as far as I could go). I could not adjust any lower. I was using shoot and see targets and hitting the one above where I was aiming. thanks

                Comment

                Working...
                X