Well at least we know the 68 receiver would work with a modified mag.
65 Receiver Set with Polymer mags from PF (HOPEFULLY)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cory View PostWell at least we know the 68 receiver would work with a modified mag.
I hate to rain on anybody's parade, but unless they secretly designed the 68 to really be a 65 and then modified it to take 6.8, it can't be stated with any certainty that it will in fact accept 6.5.Waiting for an AR in .45-70 with a 30 inch octagon barrel, case hardened receiver, and extra fancy walnut furniture. Until the day someone makes one, I guess 6.5mm Grendel will do nicely.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Paul45LC View PostWell at least we think the 68 receiver might work with a modified mag.
I hate to rain on anybody's parade, but unless they secretly designed the 68 to really be a 65 and then modified it to take 6.8, it can't be stated with any certainty that it will in fact accept 6.5.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bwaites View PostMeasurements taken at the first rib from the top did not change at 1.0325 inches, before and after loading with 10, 20, and 28 rounds.
Taken at the rib between the second and third waffles, which is about midway, started at 1.0815 empty, increased to 1.0860 with 10 rounds, 1.0890 with 20 rounds, and 1.0990 with 28 rounds.
Unloading revealed that there is drag on the first 12-15 rounds, then they move freely. The mag ribs would have to be significantly moved to make it work.
This is a no go.
Anyone need a Six8 mag?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Paul45LC View PostWell at least we think the 68 receiver might work with a modified mag.
I hate to rain on anybody's parade, but unless they secretly designed the 68 to really be a 65 and then modified it to take 6.8, it can't be stated with any certainty that it will in fact accept 6.5."Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by stanc View PostBecause nothing is certain until it's actually tried and proven to work.
Is there inherent risk involved in anything that hasn't been specifically tested, yes. That doesn't mean we can't make educated assumptions and move forward through analysis. If we were to test every single change as we go, then no R&D program would ever be affordable."Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cory View PostThe design world does not work this way Stanc. It's not longer 1875. The sciences are a little more mature.
Is there inherent risk involved in anything that hasn't been specifically tested, yes. That doesn't mean we can't make educated assumptions and move forward through analysis. If we were to test every single change as we go, then no R&D program would ever be affordable.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by PrecisionFirearms View PostBwaites:
Please load that 68 Mag with 6.8 SPC and check the same measurements. If you don't have 6.8 Ammo, I will buy that mag so I can test it.
Mark Hostetter
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bwaites View PostBut this assumption is still based on getting a modded mag, which is hundreds of thousands of dollars in expense. So it's a no go unless a big boy jumps in, and then the market remains very limited without a government level buy to help cover costs."Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bwaites View PostMark, it's yours for the asking! You've helped me so many times it's only a small token of my appreciation! Tell me where to send it!
Looking forward to seeing the comparison with 6.8 ammo, Mark!!!"Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
Comment