CFE Temperature Test

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pds
    Warrior
    • Dec 2012
    • 128

    CFE Temperature Test

    The issue of the temperature sensitivity of CFE powder has been brought up several
    times on this forum. I decided to run the following test. I loaded 10 rounds of AA
    cases with 31.0gr. of CFE powder, Rem 7 1/2 primers, and 123gr. Nosler CCBT bullets.
    I loaded 5 of these in a magazine and put them in my freezer for about 8 hours. I
    then packed the magazine between two packs of frozen blue ice then wrapped them in
    two towels before heading to the range. Once at the range I placed the other 5 rounds in the front seat of my car for about an hour with windows rolled up in the sun. Outside temp was upper 70's. The gun used is a PF Grendel upper with a 22" Bartlein barrel.
    When everything was set up I shot the 'cold' rounds first. I would guess that they were well below 32 degrees as I noticed that there was frost forming on the bullets as I loaded the magazine in the rifle. All 5 rounds were fired within less than one minute. I then shot the 'hot' rounds which I estimate to be at a temp of 85-90 degrees.
    The velocity results using a Magnetospeed:

    Cold Rounds
    1-2442 fps
    2-2510 fps
    3-2490 fps
    4-2480 fps
    5-2485 fps
    Min=2442 fps, Max=2510 fps
    Avg=2481 fps
    ES=68 fps
    SD=24.7

    Hot Rounds
    1-2553 fps
    2-2565 fps
    3-2565 fps
    4-2553 fps
    5-2552 fps
    Min=2552 fps, Max=2565 fps
    Avg=2557 fps
    ES=13 fps
    SD=6.7

    While the sample size is small, but with a difference of 76 fps average velocity between cold and hot rounds it appears that CFE is a temperature sensitive powder.
    I hope this is useful info for everyone.

    pds
  • mongoosesnipe
    Chieftain
    • May 2012
    • 1142

    #2
    I plan to do some testing with ar comp once I work up a load from everything I have read it is increadably stable in 223 and 308 so I figure its worth a shot in the Grendel
    Punctuation is for the weak....

    Comment

    • Michael
      Warrior
      • Jan 2012
      • 353

      #3
      pds - was there a difference in the grouping of the cold vs hot rounds? Know you mentioned 1MOA for cold, but was the POI different? I know the magneto speed will impact groupings, so do the 'cold' rounds group better for you without the chony on?
      I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.
      - Voltaire

      Comment

      • pds
        Warrior
        • Dec 2012
        • 128

        #4
        Originally posted by Michael View Post
        pds - was there a difference in the grouping of the cold vs hot rounds? Know you mentioned 1MOA for cold, but was the POI different? I know the magneto speed will impact groupings, so do the 'cold' rounds group better for you without the chony on?
        Michael,
        I was shooting at 100 yds into 10-15mph quarter value head wind that was constantly switching from left to right. The cold rounds were all fired within less than a minute so small group size was not a concern. However I just went and measured both groups the cold rounds measure 1.4" moa with 4 shots in a .908" moa group. The hot rounds measure 1.6" moa with 4 shots in a 1.10" moa group. The 4 shot cold group is about 1/2" lower POI than the 4 shot hot group. I feel the magnetospeed has an effect on both POI and group size.
        Hope this answers your question.

        pds

        Comment


        • #5
          It looks like the degree of sensitivity is about average. Hodgdon published charts for the 30-06 here: http://www.hodgdon.com/smokeless/extreme/page2.php#top

          Comment

          • LR1955
            Super Moderator
            • Mar 2011
            • 3364

            #6
            PDS:

            I guess it depends on how someone defines 'temperature sensitive'. To me, your results indicate a powder / primer combination that is normal. Nothing extreme at all.

            I did something more extreme with the various types of issued 7.62 and got about 70 fps difference. That with powders specifically designed to be consistent over a wide range of temperatures.

            BTW, if you ran your test under more normal temperature ranges, you would find the differences to be extremely small. Small enough that you would have to start testing with different primers and neck tensions to weed out variances.

            LR1955

            Comment

            • dammitman
              Warrior
              • Dec 2012
              • 649

              #7
              Now thats really good testing. I for one appreciate your post with information. Thanks! Just one question. Whats your COAL using those nosler 123 bullets? I have some and am getting poor results.
              Last edited by dammitman; 06-01-2014, 02:35 PM.

              Comment

              • Michael
                Warrior
                • Jan 2012
                • 353

                #8
                Originally posted by pds View Post
                Michael,
                I was shooting at 100 yds into 10-15mph quarter value head wind that was constantly switching from left to right. The cold rounds were all fired within less than a minute so small group size was not a concern. However I just went and measured both groups the cold rounds measure 1.4" moa with 4 shots in a .908" moa group. The hot rounds measure 1.6" moa with 4 shots in a 1.10" moa group. The 4 shot cold group is about 1/2" lower POI than the 4 shot hot group. I feel the magnetospeed has an effect on both POI and group size.
                Hope this answers your question.

                pds
                It does, thank you. All things being equal, I would guess that 1/2" drop at the temps you were working with is not too horrible until you get out beyond about 300yds. Still in the kill zone for hunting purposes (hypothetically). I would be curious as to the grouping size and difference in POI without the magneto speed...maybe something for me to play with later...
                I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it.
                - Voltaire

                Comment

                • pds
                  Warrior
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 128

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dammitman View Post
                  Now thats really good testing. I for one appreciate your post with information. Thanks! Just one question. Whats your COAL using those nosler 123 bullets? I have some and am getting poor results.
                  d'man,
                  The COAL for this test was 2.205" which in this chamber seats the 123NCC bullet about .010" off from touching any part of the throat.

                  pds

                  Comment

                  • explorecaves

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LR1955 View Post
                    PDS:

                    I guess it depends on how someone defines 'temperature sensitive'. To me, your results indicate a powder / primer combination that is normal. Nothing extreme at all.

                    I did something more extreme with the various types of issued 7.62 and got about 70 fps difference. That with powders specifically designed to be consistent over a wide range of temperatures.

                    BTW, if you ran your test under more normal temperature ranges, you would find the differences to be extremely small. Small enough that you would have to start testing with different primers and neck tensions to weed out variances.

                    LR1955
                    I was thinking the same thing....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X