Well after writing up a huge post full of numbers and measurements and theory and such to ask these questions..... and then deleting it all.
How should one go about dealing with the doughnut formed when necking 7.62x39 down to 6.5G
In my case if I size and don't expand I see a thicker portion (.250 by the shoulder vs .255 by the mouth) on the ID and a relatively consistent OD. Or if I expand the neck after sizing a relatively consistent ID and an OD of (.295 by the shoulder vs .290 at the mouth).
So do you ream out the unexpanded ID to .255 or turn down the expanded OD to .290 or does it matter?
Brass is KP (Lapua) and some totally unmarked brass. Both are quite consistent case to case with the unmarked brass being about .002 thicker in the neck dimensions than the KP. Also the thicker portion that I'm seeing is roughly half the length of the neck, not just a ring at the junction of the neck and shoulder which is what I had always thought was a classic "doughnut". My father in law told me that it was (is?) common for military brass to be formed with a thicker neck or thicker portion of the neck that sounds similar to what I'm seeing so maybe this is not a "doughnut" issue but simply one of case design.
Dies are Redding without the bushings. They do seem to be working the brass quite a bit, from my measurements some .010 difference between a case that has run though the die without the expander and one that's been expanded. Then thou's not much, but it seems that five would be plenty to get any of the cases I have down and then back up to size.
The FIL does have a Lyman neck turning set as well as a large collection of machinists reamers. (And a pile of metal to make a sanding rod if it comes to that) which I can snag from him next time we see them.
How should one go about dealing with the doughnut formed when necking 7.62x39 down to 6.5G
In my case if I size and don't expand I see a thicker portion (.250 by the shoulder vs .255 by the mouth) on the ID and a relatively consistent OD. Or if I expand the neck after sizing a relatively consistent ID and an OD of (.295 by the shoulder vs .290 at the mouth).
So do you ream out the unexpanded ID to .255 or turn down the expanded OD to .290 or does it matter?
Brass is KP (Lapua) and some totally unmarked brass. Both are quite consistent case to case with the unmarked brass being about .002 thicker in the neck dimensions than the KP. Also the thicker portion that I'm seeing is roughly half the length of the neck, not just a ring at the junction of the neck and shoulder which is what I had always thought was a classic "doughnut". My father in law told me that it was (is?) common for military brass to be formed with a thicker neck or thicker portion of the neck that sounds similar to what I'm seeing so maybe this is not a "doughnut" issue but simply one of case design.
Dies are Redding without the bushings. They do seem to be working the brass quite a bit, from my measurements some .010 difference between a case that has run though the die without the expander and one that's been expanded. Then thou's not much, but it seems that five would be plenty to get any of the cases I have down and then back up to size.
The FIL does have a Lyman neck turning set as well as a large collection of machinists reamers. (And a pile of metal to make a sanding rod if it comes to that) which I can snag from him next time we see them.
Comment