I really don't get it either. We were hopping for companies to start producing LFP bullets weighing less than the 120 gmx with a lower expansion threshold. Cavityback goes through the trouble of producing said bullet for around the same cost as Barnes bullets and some of you shit on it.
I understand that cavityback is trying to promote their products and some of you aren't interested. Their product and price may not meet your needs but that doesn't mean that it doesn't meet other forum member's needs. I really don't see the point in being so hostile towards them.
Seems to me the only point that cavityback is trying to get across is that their bullets are capable of submoa performance in certain reloading environments and weapons platforms.
I have not shot their bullets but I for one welcome their contributions to the Grendel community and will be ordering a box to try out against the 100gr ttsx.
I understand that cavityback is trying to promote their products and some of you aren't interested. Their product and price may not meet your needs but that doesn't mean that it doesn't meet other forum member's needs. I really don't see the point in being so hostile towards them.
Seems to me the only point that cavityback is trying to get across is that their bullets are capable of submoa performance in certain reloading environments and weapons platforms.
I have not shot their bullets but I for one welcome their contributions to the Grendel community and will be ordering a box to try out against the 100gr ttsx.
Comment